Detection rules › Elastic

Kubernetes RBAC Wildcard Elevation on Existing Role

Status
production
Severity
high
Time window
9m
Author
Elastic
Source
github.com/elastic/detection-rules

Flags an existing Role or ClusterRole being changed (patch or update) so the effective rules become cluster-admin-like: wildcard on every API resource and wildcard on every verb. That is usually a deliberate privilege expansion, not a typo. RequestResponse audit and the response body are required so the detection reads the merged role after apply; loopback source IPs are ignored.

MITRE ATT&CK coverage

Event coverage

Rules detecting the same action

Other rules on this platform that filter on the same API call or operation.

Rule body elastic

[metadata]
creation_date = "2026/04/27"
integration = ["kubernetes"]
maturity = "production"
updated_date = "2026/04/27"

[rule]
author = ["Elastic"]
description = """
Flags an existing Role or ClusterRole being changed (patch or update) so the effective rules become cluster-admin-like:
wildcard on every API resource and wildcard on every verb. That is usually a deliberate privilege expansion, not a typo.
RequestResponse audit and the response body are required so the detection reads the merged role after apply; loopback
source IPs are ignored.
"""
false_positives = [
    """
    Platform installers, GitOps controllers, and emergency break-glass roles sometimes ship or widen wildcard
    ClusterRoles; correlate with change records and narrow by user or service account when baselined.
    """,
]
from = "now-9m"
interval = "5m"
language = "esql"
license = "Elastic License v2"
name = "Kubernetes RBAC Wildcard Elevation on Existing Role"
note = """## Triage and analysis

### Investigating Kubernetes RBAC Wildcard Elevation on Existing Role

Someone patched or updated a Role or ClusterRole so the stored rules grant star verbs and star resources—near
cluster-admin breadth on that scope. Confirm the actor (user, group, impersonation), client, and non-loopback source
IP; then see who can bind that role.

### Possible investigation steps

- Diff the role YAML before and after; list RoleBindings and ClusterRoleBindings that reference it and which subjects
  gained the widened access.
- In the same window, check secret reads, exec, and further RBAC changes from the same identity.

### False positive analysis

- Approved GitOps or vendor upgrades sometimes widen a known ClusterRole; allowlist stable automation when documented.

### Response and remediation

- Revert the role, drop unexpected bindings, rotate credentials for the actor, and block future wildcard RBAC outside
  governed pipelines (policy-as-code, PR-only RBAC).
"""
references = [
    "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/006/",
    "https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/",
]
risk_score = 73
rule_id = "c8f4a2e1-9b3d-4c7e-8f2a-1d0e5b6c7a89"
severity = "high"
tags = [
    "Data Source: Kubernetes",
    "Domain: Kubernetes",
    "Use Case: Threat Detection",
    "Tactic: Privilege Escalation",
    "Resources: Investigation Guide",
]
timestamp_override = "event.ingested"
type = "esql"
query = '''
from logs-kubernetes.audit_logs-* metadata _id, _index, _version
| where
  kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource in ("roles", "clusterroles") and
  kubernetes.audit.verb in ("update", "patch") and
  `kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision` == "allow" and
  kubernetes.audit.level == "RequestResponse" and
  kubernetes.audit.stage == "ResponseComplete" and
  kubernetes.audit.sourceIPs is not null and
  not kubernetes.audit.sourceIPs in ("::1", "127.0.0.1") and
  KQL(""" kubernetes.audit.responseObject.rules.verbs:"*" and kubernetes.audit.responseObject.rules.resources:"*" """)
| keep user.name, user_agent.original, event.action, source.ip, kubernetes.audit.verb, kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource, kubernetes.audit.objectRef.name, kubernetes.audit.requestURI, kubernetes.audit.user.username, kubernetes.audit.user.groups, `kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision`, event.original, _id, _version, _index, data_stream.namespace
'''

[[rule.threat]]
framework = "MITRE ATT&CK"

[[rule.threat.technique]]
id = "T1098"
name = "Account Manipulation"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/"

[[rule.threat.technique.subtechnique]]
id = "T1098.006"
name = "Additional Container Cluster Roles"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1098/006/"

[rule.threat.tactic]
id = "TA0004"
name = "Privilege Escalation"
reference = "https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/TA0004/"

Stages and Predicates

Stage 1: from

from logs-kubernetes.audit_logs-* metadata _id, _index, _version

Stage 2: where

| where
  kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource in ("roles", "clusterroles") and
  kubernetes.audit.verb in ("update", "patch") and
  `kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision` == "allow" and
  kubernetes.audit.level == "RequestResponse" and
  kubernetes.audit.stage == "ResponseComplete" and
  kubernetes.audit.sourceIPs is not null and
  not kubernetes.audit.sourceIPs in ("::1", "127.0.0.1") and
  KQL(""" kubernetes.audit.responseObject.rules.verbs:"*" and kubernetes.audit.responseObject.rules.resources:"*" """)

Stage 3: keep

| keep user.name, user_agent.original, event.action, source.ip, kubernetes.audit.verb, kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource, kubernetes.audit.objectRef.name, kubernetes.audit.requestURI, kubernetes.audit.user.username, kubernetes.audit.user.groups, `kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision`, event.original, _id, _version, _index, data_stream.namespace

Exclusions

Top-level NOT(...) conjuncts: predicates this rule actively suppresses.

FieldKindExcluded values
kubernetes.audit.sourceIPsin127.0.0.1, ::1

Indicators

Each row is a field, operator, and value that the rule matches. The corpus column counts how many other rules in the catalog look for the same combination: high numbers point to widely-used, community-vetted indicators. Blank or 1 shows that the indicator is specific to this rule.

Output fields

Fields the rule emits when it matches. Chronicle authors list these in the outcome block; they appear on the detection and $risk_score drives alerting. Sentinel / Defender XDR rules build them up through project / summarize / extend stages. Sentinel maps these into alert fields via entityMappings and customDetails; Defender XDR custom detections surface them as alert fields directly.

FieldSource
user.nameKEEP user.name
user_agent.originalKEEP user_agent.original
event.actionKEEP event.action
source.ipKEEP source.ip
kubernetes.audit.verbKEEP kubernetes.audit.verb
kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resourceKEEP kubernetes.audit.objectRef.resource
kubernetes.audit.objectRef.nameKEEP kubernetes.audit.objectRef.name
kubernetes.audit.requestURIKEEP kubernetes.audit.requestURI
kubernetes.audit.user.usernameKEEP kubernetes.audit.user.username
kubernetes.audit.user.groupsKEEP kubernetes.audit.user.groups
`kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision`KEEP `kubernetes.audit.annotations.authorization_k8s_io/decision`
event.originalKEEP event.original
_idKEEP _id
_versionKEEP _version
_indexKEEP _index
data_stream.namespaceKEEP data_stream.namespace