Detection rules › Sigma

Sign-in Failure Due to Conditional Access Requirements Not Met

Status
test
Severity
high
Log source
product azure, service signinlogs
Author
Yochana Henderson, '@Yochana-H'
Source
github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma

Define a baseline threshold for failed sign-ins due to Conditional Access failures

MITRE ATT&CK coverage

Rules detecting the same action

Other rules on this platform that filter on the same API call or operation.

Rule body yaml

title: Sign-in Failure Due to Conditional Access Requirements Not Met
id: b4a6d707-9430-4f5f-af68-0337f52d5c42
status: test
description: Define a baseline threshold for failed sign-ins due to Conditional Access failures
references:
    - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/entra/architecture/security-operations-privileged-accounts
author: Yochana Henderson, '@Yochana-H'
date: 2022-06-01
tags:
    - attack.privilege-escalation
    - attack.persistence
    - attack.initial-access
    - attack.credential-access
    - attack.stealth
    - attack.t1110
    - attack.t1078.004
logsource:
    product: azure
    service: signinlogs
detection:
    selection:
        ResultType: 53003
        Resultdescription: Blocked by Conditional Access
    condition: selection
falsepositives:
    - Service Account misconfigured
    - Misconfigured Systems
    - Vulnerability Scanners
level: high

Stages and Predicates

Stage 0: condition

selection

Stage 1: selection

selection:
    ResultType: 53003
    Resultdescription: Blocked by Conditional Access

Indicators

Each row is a field, operator, and value that the rule matches. The corpus column counts how many other rules in the catalog look for the same combination: high numbers point to widely-used, community-vetted indicators. Blank or 1 shows that the indicator is specific to this rule.

FieldKindValues
ResultTypeeq
  • 53003
Resultdescriptioneq
  • Blocked by Conditional Access