Detection rules › Splunk
Splunk rules: 0z
Auto Admin Logon Registry Entry
#The following analytic detects a suspicious registry modification that enables auto admin logon on a host. It leverages data from the Endpoint.Registry data model, specifically looking for changes to the "AutoAdminLogon" value within the "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon" registry path. This activity is significant because it was observed in BlackMatter ransomware attacks to maintain access after a safe mode reboot, facilitating further encryption. If confirmed malicious, this could allow attackers to automatically log in and continue their operations, potentially leading to widespread network encryption and data loss.
Known False Positives
- No false positives have been identified at this time.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Credential Access |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 13: RegistryEvent (Value Set) |
Rule Body
name: Auto Admin Logon Registry Entry
id: 1379d2b8-0f18-11ec-8ca3-acde48001122
version: 15
creation_date: '2021-09-06'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk, Steven Dick
status: production
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects a suspicious registry modification that enables auto admin logon on a host. It leverages data from the Endpoint.Registry data model, specifically looking for changes to the "AutoAdminLogon" value within the "SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion\\Winlogon" registry path. This activity is significant because it was observed in BlackMatter ransomware attacks to maintain access after a safe mode reboot, facilitating further encryption. If confirmed malicious, this could allow attackers to automatically log in and continue their operations, potentially leading to widespread network encryption and data loss.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 13
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry WHERE (Registry.registry_path= "*SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion\\Winlogon*" AND Registry.registry_value_name=AutoAdminLogon AND Registry.registry_value_data=1) by Registry.action Registry.dest Registry.process_guid Registry.process_id Registry.registry_hive Registry.registry_path Registry.registry_key_name Registry.registry_value_data Registry.registry_value_name Registry.registry_value_type Registry.status Registry.user Registry.vendor_product | `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)` | where isnotnull(registry_value_data) | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `auto_admin_logon_registry_entry_filter`'
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you need to be ingesting logs with the registry value name, registry path, and registry value data from your endpoints. If you are using Sysmon, you must have at least version 2.0 of the official Sysmon TA. https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/5709
known_false_positives: No false positives have been identified at this time.
references:
- https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2021/08/09/blackmatter-ransomware-emerges-from-the-shadow-of-darkside/
finding:
title: modified registry key $registry_key_name$ with registry value $registry_value_name$ to prepare autoadminlogon
entity:
field: dest
type: system
score: 50
analytic_story:
- BlackMatter Ransomware
- Windows Registry Abuse
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1552.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry
WHERE (
Registry.registry_path= "*SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion\\Winlogon*"
AND Registry.registry_value_name=AutoAdminLogon
AND Registry.registry_value_data=1
)
by
Registry.action
Registry.dest
Registry.process_guid
Registry.process_id
Registry.registry_hive
Registry.registry_path
Registry.registry_key_name
Registry.registry_value_data
Registry.registry_value_name
Registry.registry_value_type
Registry.status
Registry.user
Registry.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)`
Stage 3: where
| where isnotnull(registry_value_data)
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `auto_admin_logon_registry_entry_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Registry.registry_path | eq |
| field:"registry_path" kind:eq value:"*SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon*" |
Registry.registry_value_data | eq |
| field:"Details" kind:eq value:"1" |
Registry.registry_value_name | eq |
| field:"registry_value_name" kind:eq value:"AutoAdminLogon" |
registry_value_data | is_not_null | field:"Details" kind:is_not_null |
AWS High Number Of Failed Authentications For User
#The following analytic detects an AWS account experiencing more than 20 failed authentication attempts within a 5-minute window. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to identify multiple failed ConsoleLogin events. This behavior is significant as it may indicate a brute force attack targeting the account. If confirmed malicious, the attacker could potentially gain unauthorized access, leading to data breaches or further exploitation of the AWS environment. Security teams should consider adjusting the threshold based on their specific environment to reduce false positives.
Known False Positives
- A user with more than 20 failed authentication attempts in the span of 5 minutes may also be triggered by a broken application.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Discovery |
Telemetry Coverage
Rules Detecting the Same Action
These rules filter on the same operation.
- AWS Console Login (Panther)
- AWS Console Login Failed During MFA Challenge (Splunk)
- AWS ConsoleLogin Failed Authentication (Sigma)
- AWS CreateLoginProfile (Splunk)
- AWS Credential Access Failed Login (Splunk)
- AWS High Number Of Failed Authentications From Ip (Splunk)
- AWS Multiple Failed MFA Requests For User (Splunk)
- AWS Multiple Users Failing To Authenticate From Ip (Splunk)
Rule Body
name: AWS High Number Of Failed Authentications For User
id: e3236f49-daf3-4b70-b808-9290912ac64d
version: 10
creation_date: '2023-01-27'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Bhavin Patel, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic detects an AWS account experiencing more than 20 failed authentication attempts within a 5-minute window. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to identify multiple failed ConsoleLogin events. This behavior is significant as it may indicate a brute force attack targeting the account. If confirmed malicious, the attacker could potentially gain unauthorized access, leading to data breaches or further exploitation of the AWS environment. Security teams should consider adjusting the threshold based on their specific environment to reduce false positives.
data_source:
- AWS CloudTrail ConsoleLogin
search: |-
`cloudtrail` eventName=ConsoleLogin action=failure
| bucket span=10m _time
| rename user_name as user
| stats dc(_raw) AS failed_attempts values(src) as src values(user_agent) as user_agent
BY _time, user, signature,
dest, vendor_account vendor_region,
vendor_product
| where failed_attempts > 20
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `aws_high_number_of_failed_authentications_for_user_filter`
how_to_implement: You must install Splunk AWS Add on and Splunk App for AWS. This search works with AWS CloudTrail logs.
known_false_positives: A user with more than 20 failed authentication attempts in the span of 5 minutes may also be triggered by a broken application.
references:
- https://www.trendmicro.com/cloudoneconformity/knowledge-base/aws/IAM/password-policy.html
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: user
type: user
score: 20
message: User $user$ failed to authenticate more than 20 times in the span of 5 minutes for AWS Account $vendor_account$
analytic_story:
- Compromised User Account
- AWS Identity and Access Management Account Takeover
asset_type: AWS Account
mitre_attack_id:
- T1201
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: cloud
security_domain: threat
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`cloudtrail` eventName=ConsoleLogin action=failure
Stage 2: bucket
| bucket span=10m _time
Stage 3: rename
| rename user_name as user
Stage 4: stats
| stats dc(_raw) AS failed_attempts values(src) as src values(user_agent) as user_agent
BY _time, user, signature,
dest, vendor_account vendor_region,
vendor_product
Stage 5: where
| where failed_attempts > 20
Stage 6: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 7: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 8: search
| `aws_high_number_of_failed_authentications_for_user_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
action | eq |
| field:"action" kind:eq value:"failure" |
eventName | eq |
| field:"aws::eventName" kind:eq value:"ConsoleLogin" |
failed_attempts | gt |
| field:"failed_attempts" kind:gt value:"20" |
sourcetype | eq |
| field:"sourcetype" kind:eq value:"aws:cloudtrail" |
AWS Network Access Control List Created with All Open Ports
#The following analytic detects the creation of AWS Network Access Control Lists (ACLs) with all ports open to a specified CIDR. It leverages AWS CloudTrail events, specifically monitoring for CreateNetworkAclEntry or ReplaceNetworkAclEntry actions with rules allowing all traffic. This activity is significant because it can expose the network to unauthorized access, increasing the risk of data breaches and other malicious activities. If confirmed malicious, an attacker could exploit this misconfiguration to gain unrestricted access to the network, potentially leading to data exfiltration, service disruption, or further compromise of the AWS environment.
Known False Positives
- It's possible that an admin has created this ACL with all ports open for some legitimate purpose however, this should be scoped and not allowed in production environment.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Defense Impairment |
Telemetry Coverage
Rules Detecting the Same Action
These rules filter on the same operation.
Rule Body
name: AWS Network Access Control List Created with All Open Ports
id: ada0f478-84a8-4641-a3f1-d82362d6bd75
version: 13
creation_date: '2020-04-29'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Bhavin Patel, Patrick Bareiss, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects the creation of AWS Network Access Control Lists (ACLs) with all ports open to a specified CIDR. It leverages AWS CloudTrail events, specifically monitoring for `CreateNetworkAclEntry` or `ReplaceNetworkAclEntry` actions with rules allowing all traffic. This activity is significant because it can expose the network to unauthorized access, increasing the risk of data breaches and other malicious activities. If confirmed malicious, an attacker could exploit this misconfiguration to gain unrestricted access to the network, potentially leading to data exfiltration, service disruption, or further compromise of the AWS environment.
data_source:
- AWS CloudTrail CreateNetworkAclEntry
- AWS CloudTrail ReplaceNetworkAclEntry
search: |-
`cloudtrail` eventName=CreateNetworkAclEntry OR eventName=ReplaceNetworkAclEntry requestParameters.ruleAction=allow requestParameters.egress=false requestParameters.aclProtocol=-1
| append [search `cloudtrail` eventName=CreateNetworkAclEntry OR eventName=ReplaceNetworkAclEntry requestParameters.ruleAction=allow requestParameters.egress=false requestParameters.aclProtocol!=-1
| eval port_range='requestParameters.portRange.to' - 'requestParameters.portRange.from'
| where port_range>1024]
| fillnull
| rename user_name as user
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY signature dest user
user_agent src vendor_account
vendor_region vendor_product requestParameters.ruleAction
requestParameters.egress requestParameters.aclProtocol requestParameters.portRange.to
requestParameters.portRange.from requestParameters.cidrBlock
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `aws_network_access_control_list_created_with_all_open_ports_filter`
how_to_implement: You must install the AWS App for Splunk (version 5.1.0 or later) and Splunk Add-on for AWS, version 4.4.0 or later, and configure your AWS CloudTrail inputs.
known_false_positives: It's possible that an admin has created this ACL with all ports open for some legitimate purpose however, this should be scoped and not allowed in production environment.
references: []
finding:
title: User $user$ has created network ACLs with all the ports open to a specified CIDR $requestParameters.cidrBlock$
entity:
field: user
type: user
score: 50
threat_objects:
- field: src
type: ip_address
analytic_story:
- AWS Network ACL Activity
asset_type: AWS Instance
mitre_attack_id:
- T1686.001
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: cloud
security_domain: network
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`cloudtrail` eventName=CreateNetworkAclEntry OR eventName=ReplaceNetworkAclEntry
requestParameters.ruleAction=allow requestParameters.egress=false
requestParameters.aclProtocol=-1
Stage 2: append
| append
[
search `cloudtrail` eventName=CreateNetworkAclEntry OR eventName=ReplaceNetworkAclEntry
requestParameters.ruleAction=allow requestParameters.egress=false
requestParameters.aclProtocol!=-1
| eval port_range='requestParameters.portRange.to' - 'requestParameters.portRange.from'
| where port_range>1024
]
Stage 3: fillnull
| fillnull
Stage 4: rename
| rename user_name as user
Stage 5: stats
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY signature dest user
user_agent src vendor_account
vendor_region vendor_product requestParameters.ruleAction
requestParameters.egress requestParameters.aclProtocol requestParameters.portRange.to
requestParameters.portRange.from requestParameters.cidrBlock
Stage 6: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 7: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 8: search
| `aws_network_access_control_list_created_with_all_open_ports_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
eventName | eq |
| field:"aws::eventName" kind:eq |
requestParameters.aclProtocol | eq |
| field:"requestParameters.aclProtocol" kind:eq value:"-1" |
requestParameters.aclProtocol | ne |
| field:"requestParameters.aclProtocol" kind:ne value:"-1" |
requestParameters.egress | eq |
| field:"requestParameters.egress" kind:eq value:"false" |
requestParameters.ruleAction | eq |
| field:"requestParameters.ruleAction" kind:eq value:"allow" |
sourcetype | eq |
| field:"sourcetype" kind:eq value:"aws:cloudtrail" |
Cisco Duo Bypass Code Generation
#The following analytic detects when a Duo user generates a bypass code, which allows them to circumvent multi-factor authentication (2FA) protections. It works by monitoring Duo activity logs for the 'bypass_create' action, renaming the affected object as the user, and aggregating events to identify instances where a bypass code is issued. This behavior is significant for a Security Operations Center (SOC) because generating a bypass code can enable attackers, malicious insiders, or unauthorized administrators to gain access to sensitive systems without the required second authentication factor. Such activity may indicate account compromise, privilege abuse, or attempts to weaken security controls. Early detection of bypass code generation is critical, as it allows the SOC to investigate and respond before an attacker can exploit the reduced authentication requirements, helping to prevent unauthorized access, data breaches, or further lateral movement within the environment. Monitoring for this action helps maintain strong authentication standards and reduces the risk of credential-based attacks.
Known False Positives
- No false positives have been identified at this time.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Persistence | |
| Defense Impairment | |
| Credential Access |
Rule Body
name: Cisco Duo Bypass Code Generation
id: 446e81ff-ce06-4925-9c7d-4073f9b5abf5
version: 6
creation_date: '2025-07-10'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Patrick Bareiss, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: |
The following analytic detects when a Duo user generates a bypass code, which allows them to circumvent multi-factor authentication (2FA) protections.
It works by monitoring Duo activity logs for the 'bypass_create' action, renaming the affected object as the user, and aggregating events to identify
instances where a bypass code is issued. This behavior is significant for a Security Operations Center (SOC) because generating a bypass code can enable
attackers, malicious insiders, or unauthorized administrators to gain access to sensitive systems without the required second authentication factor.
Such activity may indicate account compromise, privilege abuse, or attempts to weaken security controls. Early detection of bypass code generation is
critical, as it allows the SOC to investigate and respond before an attacker can exploit the reduced authentication requirements, helping to prevent
unauthorized access, data breaches, or further lateral movement within the environment. Monitoring for this action helps maintain strong authentication
standards and reduces the risk of credential-based attacks.
data_source:
- Cisco Duo Administrator
search: |-
`cisco_duo_administrator` action=bypass_create
| rename object as user
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY action actionlabel description
user
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `cisco_duo_bypass_code_generation_filter`
how_to_implement: The analytic leverages Duo activity logs to be ingested using the Cisco Security Cloud App (https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/7404).
known_false_positives: No false positives have been identified at this time.
references:
- https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/7404
finding:
title: A user $user$ has generated a bypass code
entity:
field: user
type: user
score: 50
analytic_story:
- Cisco Duo Suspicious Activity
asset_type: Identity
mitre_attack_id:
- T1556
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: application
security_domain: identity
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`cisco_duo_administrator` action=bypass_create
Stage 2: rename
| rename object as user
Stage 3: stats
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY action actionlabel description
user
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `cisco_duo_bypass_code_generation_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
action | eq |
| field:"action" kind:eq value:"bypass_create" |
sourcetype | eq |
| field:"sourcetype" kind:eq value:"cisco:duo:administrator" |
Cisco Secure Firewall - Repeated Blocked Connections
#The following analytic detects repeated blocked connection attempts from the same initiator to the same responder within a short time window. It leverages Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense logs and identifies connections where the action is set to Block, and the number of occurrences reaches or exceeds a threshold of ten within a one-minute span. This pattern may indicate a misconfigured application, unauthorized access attempts, or early stages of a brute-force or scanning operation. If confirmed malicious, this behavior may represent an attacker probing the network, attempting lateral movement, or testing firewall rules for weaknesses.
Known False Positives
- Misconfigured applications or automated scripts may generate repeated blocked traffic, particularly if attempting to reach decommissioned or restricted resources. Vulnerability scanners or penetration testing tools running in authorized environments may trigger this alert. Tuning may be required to exclude known internal tools or scanner IPs from detection.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Reconnaissance | |
| Execution | |
| Credential Access | |
| Discovery |
Rule Body
name: Cisco Secure Firewall - Repeated Blocked Connections
id: 1f57f10e-1dc5-47ea-852c-2e85b2503d79
version: 9
creation_date: '2025-04-03'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Nasreddine Bencherchali, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: |
The following analytic detects repeated blocked connection attempts from the same initiator to the same responder within a short time window. It leverages Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense logs and identifies connections where the action is set to Block, and the number of occurrences reaches or exceeds a threshold of ten within a one-minute span. This pattern may indicate a misconfigured application, unauthorized access attempts, or early stages of a brute-force or scanning operation. If confirmed malicious, this behavior may represent an attacker probing the network, attempting lateral movement, or testing firewall rules for weaknesses.
data_source:
- Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Connection Event
search: |
`cisco_secure_firewall` EventType=ConnectionEvent action IN ("Block with reset", "Block", "blocked")
| bin _time span=1m
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
Values(dest_port) as dest_port
Values(url) as url
by src, dest, transport, rule, action
| where count >= 10
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `cisco_secure_firewall___repeated_blocked_connections_filter`
how_to_implement: |
This search requires Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Logs, which
includes the ConnectionEvent EventType. This search uses an input macro named `cisco_secure_firewall`.
We strongly recommend that you specify your environment-specific configurations
(index, source, sourcetype, etc.) for Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense logs. Replace the macro definition
with configurations for your Splunk environment. The search also uses a post-filter
macro designed to filter out known false positives.
The logs are to be ingested using the Splunk Add-on for Cisco Security Cloud (https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/7404).
The access policy must also enable logging.
known_false_positives: |
Misconfigured applications or automated scripts may generate repeated blocked traffic, particularly if attempting to reach decommissioned or restricted resources.
Vulnerability scanners or penetration testing tools running in authorized environments may trigger this alert.
Tuning may be required to exclude known internal tools or scanner IPs from detection.
references:
- https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/firepower/741/api/FQE/secure_firewall_estreamer_fqe_guide_740.pdf
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: src
type: system
score: 20
message: Repeated blocked connections detected from $src$ to $dest$ according to the configured firewall rule $rule$
threat_objects:
- field: url
type: url
analytic_story:
- Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Analytics
asset_type: Network
mitre_attack_id:
- T1018
- T1046
- T1110
- T1203
- T1595.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Cloud
- Splunk Enterprise Security
category: network
security_domain: network
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`cisco_secure_firewall` EventType=ConnectionEvent action IN ("Block with reset", "Block", "blocked")
Stage 2: bucket
| bin _time span=1m
Stage 3: stats
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
Values(dest_port) as dest_port
Values(url) as url
by src, dest, transport, rule, action
Stage 4: where
| where count >= 10
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 7: search
| `cisco_secure_firewall___repeated_blocked_connections_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventType | eq |
| field:"EventType" kind:eq value:"ConnectionEvent" |
action | in |
| field:"action" kind:in |
count | ge |
| field:"count" kind:ge value:"10" |
sourcetype | eq |
| field:"sourcetype" kind:eq value:"cisco:sfw:estreamer" |
CMD execution with _c (Windows Event Log)
#The cmd.exe /c command is used to execute a specific command and then terminate the command prompt (CMD) window and is commonly seen in both legitimate and malicious scripted processes. Attackers may use /c after commands to avoid detection
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Execution |
References
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
id: '21846.38490'
title: CMD execution with _c
description: 'The cmd.exe /c command is used to execute a specific command and then
terminate the command prompt (CMD) window and is commonly seen in both legitimate
and malicious scripted processes. Attackers may use /c after commands to avoid detection.
-- Threat Actor Association: Mustang Panda (aka. Stately Taurus//Earth Preta/BRONZE
PRESIDENT/TA416/RedDelta), Volt Typhoon - Software Association: DarkGate, Snatch
-- Atomics T1036 Test #2 Atomics T1059.003 Test #5'
logic_format: Splunk
logic: '`get_endpoint_data` `get_endpoint_data_winevent` (TERM(EventCode=4688) OR
"<EventID>4688<" OR Type=Process) "cmd.exe" "/c" | regex process="(?i)cmd(\.exe(\"?))?\s+\/c\s+"
| table _time, host, user, process, process_*, parent_process, parent_process_*,
user | bin span=1s | stats values(*) as * by _time, host '
techniques:
- execution:command and scripting interpreter:windows command shell
technique_id:
- T1059.003
data_category:
- Process command-line parameters
- Windows event logs
references:
- https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1036/T1036.md#atomic-test-2---malware-masquerading-and-execution-from-zip-file
- https://twitter.com/ffforward/status/1481672378639912960
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`get_endpoint_data` `get_endpoint_data_winevent` (TERM(EventCode=4688) OR "<EventID>4688<" OR Type=Process) "cmd.exe" "/c"
Stage 2: regex
| regex process="(?i)cmd(\.exe(\"?))?\s+\/c\s+"
Stage 3: table
| table _time, host, user, process, process_*, parent_process, parent_process_*, user
Stage 4: bucket
| bin span=1s
Stage 5: stats
| stats values(*) as * by _time, host
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventCode | eq |
| field:"EventID" kind:eq value:"4688" |
process | regex_match |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:regex_match |
Search Terms
These SPL tokens match against raw event text.
| Stage | Term |
|---|---|
| 1 | "<EventID>4688<" |
| 1 | "cmd.exe" |
| 1 | "/c" |
Command Line lsass request (Windows Event Log)
#The memory of lsass.exe is often dumped for credential theft attacks. This use case looks for instances of when lsass.exe has been called by powershell.exe or cmd.exe
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Credential Access |
References
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
id: '6088.6537'
title: Command Line lsass request
description: 'The memory of lsass.exe is often dumped for credential theft attacks.
This use case looks for instances of when lsass.exe has been called by powershell.exe
or cmd.exe -- Threat Actor Association: Alloy Taurus/Gallium, Cadet Blizzard, Flax
Typhoon, Redfly, Witchetty - Software Association: Blackcat/ALPHV, Clop, Quantum,
Vice Society -- Atomics T1003.002 Test #4'
logic_format: Splunk
logic: '`get_endpoint_data` `get_endpoint_data_winevent` TERM(lsass) (TERM(cmd) OR
TERM(powershell)) | table _time, host, user parent_*, process, process_*, signature_id
| bin span=5s | stats values(*) as * by _time, host '
techniques:
- credential-access:os credential dumping
technique_id:
- T1003
data_category:
- Windows event logs
references:
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mattifestation/PowerSploit/master/Exfiltration/Out-Minidump.ps1
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`get_endpoint_data` `get_endpoint_data_winevent` TERM(lsass) (TERM(cmd) OR TERM(powershell))
Stage 2: table
| table _time, host, user parent_*, process, process_*, signature_id
Stage 3: bucket
| bin span=5s
Stage 4: stats
| stats values(*) as * by _time, host
Search Terms
These SPL tokens match against raw event text.
| Stage | Term |
|---|---|
| 1 | lsass |
| 1 | cmd |
| 1 | powershell |
GetDomainGroup with PowerShell Script Block
#The following analytic detects the execution of the Get-DomainGroup cmdlet using PowerShell Script Block Logging (EventCode=4104). This cmdlet, part of the PowerView tool, is used to enumerate domain groups within a Windows domain. The detection leverages script block text to identify this specific command. Monitoring this activity is crucial as it may indicate an adversary or Red Team performing reconnaissance to gain situational awareness and map out Active Directory structures. If confirmed malicious, this activity could lead to further exploitation, including privilege escalation and lateral movement within the network.
Known False Positives
- Administrators or power users may use this PowerView functions for troubleshooting.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Discovery |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| PowerShell | Event ID 4104: Creating Scriptblock text (MessageNumber of MessageTotal). |
Rule Body
name: GetDomainGroup with PowerShell Script Block
id: 09725404-a44f-4ed3-9efa-8ed5d69e4c53
version: 13
creation_date: '2021-08-27'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Mauricio Velazco, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects the execution of the `Get-DomainGroup` cmdlet using PowerShell Script Block Logging (EventCode=4104). This cmdlet, part of the PowerView tool, is used to enumerate domain groups within a Windows domain. The detection leverages script block text to identify this specific command. Monitoring this activity is crucial as it may indicate an adversary or Red Team performing reconnaissance to gain situational awareness and map out Active Directory structures. If confirmed malicious, this activity could lead to further exploitation, including privilege escalation and lateral movement within the network.
data_source:
- Powershell Script Block Logging 4104
search: |-
`powershell` EventCode=4104 (ScriptBlockText = "*Get-DomainGroup*")
| fillnull
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY dest signature signature_id
user_id vendor_product EventID
Guid Opcode Name
Path ProcessID ScriptBlockId
ScriptBlockText
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `getdomaingroup_with_powershell_script_block_filter`
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this analytic, you will need to enable PowerShell Script Block Logging on some or all endpoints. Additional setup here https://help.splunk.com/en/security-offerings/splunk-user-behavior-analytics/get-data-in/5.4.1/add-other-data-to-splunk-uba/configure-powershell-logging-to-see-powershell-anomalies-in-splunk-uba.
known_false_positives: Administrators or power users may use this PowerView functions for troubleshooting.
references:
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1069/002/
- https://powersploit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Recon/Get-DomainGroup/
finding:
title: Domain group discovery enumeration using PowerView on $dest$ by $user_id$
entity:
field: dest
type: system
score: 50
analytic_story:
- Active Directory Discovery
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1069.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`powershell` EventCode=4104 (ScriptBlockText = "*Get-DomainGroup*")
Stage 2: fillnull
| fillnull
Stage 3: stats
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY dest signature signature_id
user_id vendor_product EventID
Guid Opcode Name
Path ProcessID ScriptBlockId
ScriptBlockText
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `getdomaingroup_with_powershell_script_block_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventCode | eq |
| field:"EventID" kind:eq value:"4104" |
ScriptBlockText | eq |
| field:"ScriptBlockText" kind:eq value:"*Get-DomainGroup*" |
Rundll32 Control RunDLL World Writable Directory
#The following analytic detects the execution of rundll32.exe with the Control_RunDLL command, loading files from world-writable directories such as windows\temp, programdata, or appdata. This detection leverages Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) telemetry, focusing on process command-line data and specific directory paths. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attempt to exploit CVE-2021-40444 or similar vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized code execution, privilege escalation, or persistent access within the environment.
Known False Positives
- This may be tuned, or a new one related, by adding .cpl to command-line. However, it's important to look for both. Tune/filter as needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Stealth |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Rundll32 Control RunDLL World Writable Directory
id: 1adffe86-10c3-11ec-8ce6-acde48001122
version: 13
creation_date: '2021-09-08'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects the execution of rundll32.exe with the `Control_RunDLL` command, loading files from world-writable directories such as windows\temp, programdata, or appdata. This detection leverages Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) telemetry, focusing on process command-line data and specific directory paths. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attempt to exploit CVE-2021-40444 or similar vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized code execution, privilege escalation, or persistent access within the environment.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where `process_rundll32` Processes.process=*Control_RunDLL* AND Processes.process IN ("*\\appdata\\*", "*\\windows\\temp\\*", "*\\programdata\\*") by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `rundll32_control_rundll_world_writable_directory_filter`'
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process. Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: This may be tuned, or a new one related, by adding .cpl to command-line. However, it's important to look for both. Tune/filter as needed.
references:
- https://strontic.github.io/xcyclopedia/library/rundll32.exe-111474C61232202B5B588D2B512CBB25.html
- https://app.any.run/tasks/36c14029-9df8-439c-bba0-45f2643b0c70/
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1218/011/
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40444
- https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/master/atomics/T1218.002/T1218.002.yaml
- https://redcanary.com/blog/intelligence-insights-december-2021/
finding:
title: An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to load a suspicious file from disk.
entity:
field: user
type: user
score: 50
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 50
message: An instance of $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$ was identified on endpoint $dest$ by user $user$ attempting to load a suspicious file from disk.
threat_objects:
- field: parent_process_name
type: parent_process_name
- field: process_name
type: process_name
analytic_story:
- Microsoft MSHTML Remote Code Execution CVE-2021-40444
- Suspicious Rundll32 Activity
- Living Off The Land
- Compromised Windows Host
asset_type: Endpoint
cve:
- CVE-2021-40444
mitre_attack_id:
- T1218.011
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
where `process_rundll32` Processes.process=*Control_RunDLL* AND Processes.process IN (
"*\\appdata\\*",
"*\\windows\\temp\\*",
"*\\programdata\\*"
)
by
Processes.action
Processes.dest
Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process
Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name
Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process
Processes.process_exec
Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash
Processes.process_id
Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name
Processes.process_path
Processes.user
Processes.user_id
Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `rundll32_control_rundll_world_writable_directory_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.original_file_name | eq |
| field:"OriginalFileName" kind:eq value:"RUNDLL32.EXE" |
Processes.process | eq |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:eq value:"*Control_RunDLL*" |
Processes.process | in |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:in |
Processes.process_name | eq |
| field:"process_basename" kind:eq value:"rundll32.exe" |
Set Default PowerShell Execution Policy To Unrestricted or Bypass
#The following analytic detects changes to the PowerShell ExecutionPolicy in the registry to "Unrestricted" or "Bypass." It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on registry modifications under the path Software\Microsoft\Powershell\1\ShellIds\Microsoft.PowerShell. This activity is significant because setting the ExecutionPolicy to these values can allow the execution of potentially malicious scripts without restriction. If confirmed malicious, this could enable an attacker to execute arbitrary code, leading to further compromise of the system and potential escalation of privileges.
Known False Positives
- Administrators may attempt to change the default execution policy on a system for a variety of reasons. However, setting the policy to "unrestricted" or "bypass" as this search is designed to identify, would be unusual. Hits should be reviewed and investigated as appropriate.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Execution |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 13: RegistryEvent (Value Set) |
Rule Body
name: Set Default PowerShell Execution Policy To Unrestricted or Bypass
id: c2590137-0b08-4985-9ec5-6ae23d92f63d
version: 23
creation_date: '2019-10-16'
modification_date: '2026-07-20'
author: Steven Dick, Patrick Bareiss, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects changes to the PowerShell ExecutionPolicy in the registry to "Unrestricted" or "Bypass." It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on registry modifications under the path *Software\Microsoft\Powershell\1\ShellIds\Microsoft.PowerShell*. This activity is significant because setting the ExecutionPolicy to these values can allow the execution of potentially malicious scripts without restriction. If confirmed malicious, this could enable an attacker to execute arbitrary code, leading to further compromise of the system and potential escalation of privileges.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 13
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry WHERE (Registry.registry_path=*Software\\Microsoft\\Powershell\\1\\ShellIds\\Microsoft.PowerShell* Registry.registry_value_name=ExecutionPolicy (Registry.registry_value_data=Unrestricted OR Registry.registry_value_data=Bypass)) by Registry.action Registry.dest Registry.process_guid Registry.process_id Registry.registry_hive Registry.registry_path Registry.registry_key_name Registry.registry_value_data Registry.registry_value_name Registry.registry_value_type Registry.status Registry.user Registry.vendor_product | `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `set_default_powershell_execution_policy_to_unrestricted_or_bypass_filter`'
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process. Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: Administrators may attempt to change the default execution policy on a system for a variety of reasons. However, setting the policy to "unrestricted" or "bypass" as this search is designed to identify, would be unusual. Hits should be reviewed and investigated as appropriate.
references: []
finding:
title: A registry modification in $registry_path$ with reg key $registry_key_name$ and reg value $registry_value_name$ in host $dest$
entity:
field: dest
type: system
score: 50
threat_objects:
- field: registry_path
type: registry_path
analytic_story:
- SolarWinds WHD RCE Post Exploitation
- HAFNIUM Group
- Hermetic Wiper
- Credential Dumping
- Malicious PowerShell
- Data Destruction
- DarkGate Malware
- SystemBC
- Starland RAT Campaign
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1059.001
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry
WHERE (
Registry.registry_path=*Software\\Microsoft\\Powershell\\1\\ShellIds\\Microsoft.PowerShell*
Registry.registry_value_name=ExecutionPolicy
(Registry.registry_value_data=Unrestricted OR Registry.registry_value_data=Bypass)
)
by
Registry.action
Registry.dest
Registry.process_guid
Registry.process_id
Registry.registry_hive
Registry.registry_path
Registry.registry_key_name
Registry.registry_value_data
Registry.registry_value_name
Registry.registry_value_type
Registry.status
Registry.user
Registry.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `set_default_powershell_execution_policy_to_unrestricted_or_bypass_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Registry.registry_path | eq |
| field:"registry_path" kind:eq value:"*Software\\Microsoft\\Powershell\\1\\ShellIds\\Microsoft.PowerShell*" |
Registry.registry_value_data | eq |
| field:"Details" kind:eq |
Registry.registry_value_name | eq |
| field:"registry_value_name" kind:eq value:"ExecutionPolicy" |
Suspicious Copy on System32
#The following analytic detects potentially suspicious file copy operations targeting the System32 or SysWow64 directories as source, often indicative of malicious activity. It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on activity initiated by command-line tools like cmd.exe or PowerShell. This behavior is significant as it may indicate an attempt to evade defenses by copying an existing binary from the system directory and renaming it. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow an attacker to execute code undetected and potentially leading to system compromise or further lateral movement within the network.
Known False Positives
- Copying files from System directories can happen for multiple admin reasons, allbeit rare without approval. Apply additional filters where needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Stealth |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Suspicious Copy on System32
id: ce633e56-25b2-11ec-9e76-acde48001122
version: 16
creation_date: '2021-10-05'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Nasreddine Bencherchali, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: |
The following analytic detects potentially suspicious file copy operations targeting the
System32 or SysWow64 directories as source, often indicative of malicious activity.
It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents,
focusing on activity initiated by command-line tools like cmd.exe or PowerShell.
This behavior is significant as it may indicate an attempt to evade defenses by copying
an existing binary from the system directory and renaming it.
If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow an attacker to execute
code undetected and potentially leading to system compromise or further lateral movement
within the network.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
search: |
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where
Processes.parent_process_name IN (
"cmd.exe",
"powershell.exe",
"pwsh.exe",
"sqlps.exe",
"sqltoolsps.exe"
)
(
Processes.process_name IN ("copy.exe", "xcopy.exe")
OR
Processes.original_file_name IN ("copy.exe", "xcopy.exe")
)
Processes.process IN (
"* \"C:\\Windows\\System32\\*",
"* \'C:\\Windows\\System32\\*",
"* C:\\Windows\\System32\\*",
"* \"C:\\Windows\\SysWow64\\*",
"* \'C:\\Windows\\SysWow64\\*",
"* C:\\Windows\\SysWow64\\*"
)
by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid Processes.process_hash
Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name Processes.process_path
Processes.user Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `suspicious_copy_on_system32_filter`
how_to_implement: |
The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search,
you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must
be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint`
data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field
names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: Copying files from System directories can happen for multiple admin reasons, allbeit rare without approval. Apply additional filters where needed.
references:
- https://www.hybrid-analysis.com/sample/8da5b75b6380a41eee3a399c43dfe0d99eeefaa1fd21027a07b1ecaa4cd96fdd?environmentId=120
- https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2023/05/24/volt-typhoon-targets-us-critical-infrastructure-with-living-off-the-land-techniques/
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: Execution of copy exe to copy file from $process$ on $dest$
- field: user
type: user
score: 20
message: Execution of copy exe to copy file from $process$ on $dest$
analytic_story:
- Qakbot
- Sandworm Tools
- IcedID
- Volt Typhoon
- AsyncRAT
- Unusual Processes
- Compromised Windows Host
- Water Gamayun
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1036.003
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time)
as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where
Processes.parent_process_name IN (
"cmd.exe",
"powershell.exe",
"pwsh.exe",
"sqlps.exe",
"sqltoolsps.exe"
)
(
Processes.process_name IN ("copy.exe", "xcopy.exe")
OR
Processes.original_file_name IN ("copy.exe", "xcopy.exe")
)
Processes.process IN (
"* \"C:\\Windows\\System32\\*",
"* \'C:\\Windows\\System32\\*",
"* C:\\Windows\\System32\\*",
"* \"C:\\Windows\\SysWow64\\*",
"* \'C:\\Windows\\SysWow64\\*",
"* C:\\Windows\\SysWow64\\*"
)
by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid Processes.process_hash
Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name Processes.process_path
Processes.user Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `suspicious_copy_on_system32_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.original_file_name | in |
| field:"OriginalFileName" kind:in |
Processes.parent_process_name | in |
| field:"parent_process_basename" kind:in |
Processes.process | in |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:in |
Processes.process_name | in |
| field:"process_basename" kind:in |
Suspicious PowerShell Parameter Substring (Windows Event Log)
#Threat actors may use obfuscated and truncated PowerShell execution arguments to evade detection, leveraging PowerShell's parameter binding functionality that allows partial matching of command-line arguments. This use case detects process executions containing substrings for commonly abused PowerShell parameters.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Execution |
References
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
id: '30388.54457'
title: Suspicious PowerShell Parameter Substring
description: Threat actors may use obfuscated and truncated PowerShell execution arguments
to evade detection, leveraging PowerShell's parameter binding functionality that
allows partial matching of command-line arguments. This use case detects process
executions containing substrings for commonly abused PowerShell parameters.
logic_format: Splunk
logic: '`get_endpoint_data` `get_endpoint_data_winevent` (TERM(EventCode=4688) OR
"EventID>4688<" OR Type=Process) ("cmd.exe" OR "pwsh.exe" OR "powershell.exe") ("
-windowstyl " OR " -windowsty " OR " -windowst " OR " -windows " OR " -windo " OR
" -wind " OR " -win " OR " -wi") OR (" -executionpolic " OR " -executionpoli " OR
" -executionpol " OR " -executionpo " OR " -executionp " OR " -execution " OR "
-executio " OR " -executi " OR " -execut " OR " -execu " OR " -exec " OR " -exe
" OR " -ex") OR " -NoPr " OR " -NoPro " OR " -NoProf " OR " -NoProfi " OR " -NoProfil
" OR " -nonin " OR " -nonint " OR " -noninte " OR " -noninter " OR " -nonintera
" OR " -noninterac " OR " -noninteract " OR " -noninteracti " OR " -noninteractiv
" OR " -ec " OR " -encodedComman " OR " -encodedComma " OR " -encodedComm " OR "
-encodedCom " OR " -encodedCo " OR " -encodedC " OR " -encoded " OR " -encode "
OR " -encod " OR " -enco " OR " -en " OR (" /windowstyle " OR " /windowstyl " OR
" /windowsty " OR " /windowst " OR " /windows " OR " /windo " OR " /wind " OR "
/win " OR " /wi") OR (" /executionpolic " OR " /executionpoli " OR " /executionpol
" OR " /executionpo " OR " /executionp " OR " /execution " OR " /executio " OR "
/executi " OR " /execut " OR " /execu " OR " /exec " OR " /exe " OR " /ex") OR "
/NoPr " OR " /NoPro " OR " /NoProf " OR " /NoProfi " OR " /NoProfil " OR " /nonin
" OR " /nonint " OR " /noninte " OR " /noninter " OR " /nonintera " OR " /noninterac
" OR " /noninteract " OR " /noninteracti " OR " /noninteractiv " OR " /ec " OR "
/encodedComman " OR " /encodedComma " OR " /encodedComm " OR " /encodedCom " OR
" /encodedCo " OR " /encodedC " OR " /encoded " OR " /encode " OR " /encod " OR
" /enco " OR " /en" | regex process="(?i)\s(-|\/)(win?d?o?w?s?t?y?l?\s+hi?d?d?e?|windowstyle\s+h\s|NoPro?f?i?l?\s|nonint?e?r?a?c?t?i?v?\s|enc?o?d?e?d?C?o?m?m?a?n?\s|((exe?c?u?t?i?o?n?p?o?l?i?c?)|ep)\s+(bypass)?|ec\s)"
| table _time, host, user user, process, process_*, parent_* | bin span=1s | stats
values(*) as * by _time, host '
techniques:
- execution:command and scripting interpreter:powershell
technique_id:
- T1059.001
data_category:
- Process command-line parameters
- Windows event logs
references:
- http://www.danielbohannon.com/blog-1/2017/3/12/powershell-execution-argument-obfuscation-how-it-can-make-detection-easier
- https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/blob/c0332a9d96f6c7804fcc85dd706caed889446a62/rules/windows/process_creation/proc_creation_win_powershell_susp_parameter_variation.yml
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`get_endpoint_data` `get_endpoint_data_winevent` (TERM(EventCode=4688) OR "EventID>4688<" OR Type=Process) ("cmd.exe" OR "pwsh.exe" OR "powershell.exe") (" -windowstyl " OR " -windowsty " OR " -windowst " OR " -windows " OR " -windo " OR " -wind " OR " -win " OR " -wi") OR (" -executionpolic " OR " -executionpoli " OR " -executionpol " OR " -executionpo " OR " -executionp " OR " -execution " OR " -executio " OR " -executi " OR " -execut " OR " -execu " OR " -exec " OR " -exe " OR " -ex") OR " -NoPr " OR " -NoPro " OR " -NoProf " OR " -NoProfi " OR " -NoProfil " OR " -nonin " OR " -nonint " OR " -noninte " OR " -noninter " OR " -nonintera " OR " -noninterac " OR " -noninteract " OR " -noninteracti " OR " -noninteractiv " OR " -ec " OR " -encodedComman " OR " -encodedComma " OR " -encodedComm " OR " -encodedCom " OR " -encodedCo " OR " -encodedC " OR " -encoded " OR " -encode " OR " -encod " OR " -enco " OR " -en " OR (" /windowstyle " OR " /windowstyl " OR " /windowsty " OR " /windowst " OR " /windows " OR " /windo " OR " /wind " OR " /win " OR " /wi") OR (" /executionpolic " OR " /executionpoli " OR " /executionpol " OR " /executionpo " OR " /executionp " OR " /execution " OR " /executio " OR " /executi " OR " /execut " OR " /execu " OR " /exec " OR " /exe " OR " /ex") OR " /NoPr " OR " /NoPro " OR " /NoProf " OR " /NoProfi " OR " /NoProfil " OR " /nonin " OR " /nonint " OR " /noninte " OR " /noninter " OR " /nonintera " OR " /noninterac " OR " /noninteract " OR " /noninteracti " OR " /noninteractiv " OR " /ec " OR " /encodedComman " OR " /encodedComma " OR " /encodedComm " OR " /encodedCom " OR " /encodedCo " OR " /encodedC " OR " /encoded " OR " /encode " OR " /encod " OR " /enco " OR " /en"
Stage 2: regex
| regex
process="(?i)\s(-|\/)(win?d?o?w?s?t?y?l?\s+hi?d?d?e?|windowstyle\s+h\s|NoPro?f?i?l?\s|nonint?e?r?a?c?t?i?v?\s|enc?o?d?e?d?C?o?m?m?a?n?\s|((exe?c?u?t?i?o?n?p?o?l?i?c?)|ep)\s+(bypass)?|ec\s)"
Stage 3: table
| table _time, host, user user, process, process_*, parent_*
Stage 4: bucket
| bin span=1s
Stage 5: stats
| stats values(*) as * by _time, host
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventCode | eq |
| field:"EventID" kind:eq value:"4688" |
process | regex_match |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:regex_match value:"(?i)\s(-|\/)(win?d?o?w?s?t?y?l?\s+hi?d?d?e?|windowstyle\s+h\s|NoPro?f?i?l?\s|nonint?e?r?a?c?t?i?v?\s|enc?o?d?e?d?C?o?m?m?a?n?\s|((exe?c?u?t?i?o?n?p?o?l?i?c?)|ep)\s+(bypass)?|ec\s)" |
Search Terms
These SPL tokens match against raw event text.
| Stage | Term |
|---|---|
| 1 | "EventID>4688<" |
| 1 | "cmd.exe" |
| 1 | "pwsh.exe" |
| 1 | "powershell.exe" |
| 1 | " -windowstyl " |
| 1 | " -windowsty " |
| 1 | " -windowst " |
| 1 | " -windows " |
| 1 | " -windo " |
| 1 | " -wind " |
| 1 | " -win " |
| 1 | " -wi" |
| 1 | " -executionpolic " |
| 1 | " -executionpoli " |
| 1 | " -executionpol " |
| 1 | " -executionpo " |
| 1 | " -executionp " |
| 1 | " -execution " |
| 1 | " -executio " |
| 1 | " -executi " |
| 1 | " -execut " |
| 1 | " -execu " |
| 1 | " -exec " |
| 1 | " -exe " |
| 1 | " -ex" |
| 1 | " -NoPr " |
| 1 | " -NoPro " |
| 1 | " -NoProf " |
| 1 | " -NoProfi " |
| 1 | " -NoProfil " |
| 1 | " -nonin " |
| 1 | " -nonint " |
| 1 | " -noninte " |
| 1 | " -noninter " |
| 1 | " -nonintera " |
| 1 | " -noninterac " |
| 1 | " -noninteract " |
| 1 | " -noninteracti " |
| 1 | " -noninteractiv " |
| 1 | " -ec " |
| 1 | " -encodedComman " |
| 1 | " -encodedComma " |
| 1 | " -encodedComm " |
| 1 | " -encodedCom " |
| 1 | " -encodedCo " |
| 1 | " -encodedC " |
| 1 | " -encoded " |
| 1 | " -encode " |
| 1 | " -encod " |
| 1 | " -enco " |
| 1 | " -en " |
| 1 | " /windowstyle " |
| 1 | " /windowstyl " |
| 1 | " /windowsty " |
| 1 | " /windowst " |
| 1 | " /windows " |
| 1 | " /windo " |
| 1 | " /wind " |
| 1 | " /win " |
| 1 | " /wi" |
| 1 | " /executionpolic " |
| 1 | " /executionpoli " |
| 1 | " /executionpol " |
| 1 | " /executionpo " |
| 1 | " /executionp " |
| 1 | " /execution " |
| 1 | " /executio " |
| 1 | " /executi " |
| 1 | " /execut " |
| 1 | " /execu " |
| 1 | " /exec " |
| 1 | " /exe " |
| 1 | " /ex" |
| 1 | " /NoPr " |
| 1 | " /NoPro " |
| 1 | " /NoProf " |
| 1 | " /NoProfi " |
| 1 | " /NoProfil " |
| 1 | " /nonin " |
| 1 | " /nonint " |
| 1 | " /noninte " |
| 1 | " /noninter " |
| 1 | " /nonintera " |
| 1 | " /noninterac " |
| 1 | " /noninteract " |
| 1 | " /noninteracti " |
| 1 | " /noninteractiv " |
| 1 | " /ec " |
| 1 | " /encodedComman " |
| 1 | " /encodedComma " |
| 1 | " /encodedComm " |
| 1 | " /encodedCom " |
| 1 | " /encodedCo " |
| 1 | " /encodedC " |
| 1 | " /encoded " |
| 1 | " /encode " |
| 1 | " /encod " |
| 1 | " /enco " |
| 1 | " /en" |
Web Servers Executing Suspicious Processes
#The following analytic detects the execution of suspicious processes on systems identified as web servers. It leverages the Splunk data model "Endpoint.Processes" to search for specific process names such as "whoami", "ping", "iptables", "wget", "service", and "curl". This activity is significant because these processes are often used by attackers for reconnaissance, persistence, or data exfiltration. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to data theft, deployment of additional malware, or even ransomware attacks. Immediate investigation is required to determine the legitimacy of the activity and mitigate potential threats.
Known False Positives
- Some of these processes may be used legitimately on web servers during maintenance or other administrative tasks.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Discovery |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
Rule Body
name: Web Servers Executing Suspicious Processes
id: ec3b7601-689a-4463-94e0-c9f45638efb9
version: 9
creation_date: '2019-10-16'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: David Dorsey, Splunk
status: experimental
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects the execution of suspicious processes on systems identified as web servers. It leverages the Splunk data model "Endpoint.Processes" to search for specific process names such as "whoami", "ping", "iptables", "wget", "service", and "curl". This activity is significant because these processes are often used by attackers for reconnaissance, persistence, or data exfiltration. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to data theft, deployment of additional malware, or even ransomware attacks. Immediate investigation is required to determine the legitimacy of the activity and mitigate potential threats.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
search: |-
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
WHERE Processes.dest_category="web_server"
AND
(Processes.process="*whoami*"
OR
Processes.process="*ping*"
OR
Processes.process="*iptables*"
OR
Processes.process="*wget*"
OR
Processes.process="*service*"
OR
Processes.process="*curl*")
BY Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `web_servers_executing_suspicious_processes_filter`
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process. Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: Some of these processes may be used legitimately on web servers during maintenance or other administrative tasks.
references: []
finding:
title: Suspicious Processes observed on web server $dest$
entity:
field: user
type: user
score: 50
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 50
message: Suspicious Processes observed on web server $dest$
analytic_story:
- Apache Struts Vulnerability
asset_type: Web Server
mitre_attack_id:
- T1082
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
WHERE Processes.dest_category="web_server"
AND
(
Processes.process="*whoami*"
OR Processes.process="*ping*"
OR Processes.process="*iptables*"
OR Processes.process="*wget*"
OR Processes.process="*service*"
OR Processes.process="*curl*"
)
BY
Processes.action
Processes.dest
Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process
Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name
Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process
Processes.process_exec
Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash
Processes.process_id
Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name
Processes.process_path
Processes.user
Processes.user_id
Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `web_servers_executing_suspicious_processes_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.dest_category | eq |
| field:"dest_category" kind:eq value:"web_server" |
Processes.process | eq |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:eq |
Windows Apache Benchmark Binary
#The following analytic detects the execution of the Apache Benchmark binary (ab.exe), commonly used by MetaSploit payloads. It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process creation events where the original file name is ab.exe. This activity is significant as it may indicate the presence of a MetaSploit attack, which uses Apache Benchmark to generate malicious payloads. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized network connections, further system compromise, and potential data exfiltration. Immediate investigation is required to determine the intent and scope of the activity.
Known False Positives
- False positives should be limited as there is a small subset of binaries that contain the original file name of ab.exe. Filter as needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Execution |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Windows Apache Benchmark Binary
id: 894f48ea-8d85-4dcd-9132-c66cdb407c9b
version: 12
creation_date: '2022-06-17'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic detects the execution of the Apache Benchmark binary (ab.exe), commonly used by MetaSploit payloads. It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process creation events where the original file name is ab.exe. This activity is significant as it may indicate the presence of a MetaSploit attack, which uses Apache Benchmark to generate malicious payloads. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized network connections, further system compromise, and potential data exfiltration. Immediate investigation is required to determine the intent and scope of the activity.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
search: |-
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
WHERE Processes.original_file_name=ab.exe
BY Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_apache_benchmark_binary_filter`
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process. Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: False positives should be limited as there is a small subset of binaries that contain the original file name of ab.exe. Filter as needed.
references:
- https://seclists.org/metasploit/2013/q3/13
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: user
type: user
score: 20
message: A known MetaSploit default payload has been identified on $dest$ ran by $user$, $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$.
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: A known MetaSploit default payload has been identified on $dest$ ran by $user$, $parent_process_name$ spawning $process_name$.
threat_objects:
- field: parent_process_name
type: parent_process_name
- field: process_name
type: process_name
analytic_story:
- MetaSploit
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1059
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
WHERE Processes.original_file_name=ab.exe
BY
Processes.action
Processes.dest
Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process
Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name
Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process
Processes.process_exec
Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash
Processes.process_id
Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name
Processes.process_path
Processes.user
Processes.user_id
Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_apache_benchmark_binary_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.original_file_name | eq |
| field:"OriginalFileName" kind:eq value:"ab.exe" |
Windows AppX Deployment Full Trust Package Installation
#The following analytic detects the installation of MSIX/AppX packages with full trust privileges. This detection leverages Windows event logs from the AppXDeployment-Server, specifically focusing on EventCode 400 which indicates a package deployment operation. Full trust packages are significant as they run with elevated privileges outside the normal AppX container restrictions, allowing them to access system resources that regular AppX packages cannot. Adversaries have been observed leveraging full trust MSIX packages to deliver malware, as documented in recent threat intelligence reports. If confirmed malicious, these packages could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges, establish persistence, or deliver malware while evading traditional detection mechanisms.
Known False Positives
- Legitimate applications may be deployed as full trust MSIX packages, especially line-of-business applications that require access to system resources. Microsoft Store applications, development tools, and enterprise applications may legitimately use full trust packages. Verify if the package is from a trusted source and signed by a trusted publisher before taking action. Review the package source URI and calling process to determine if the installation is expected in your environment.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Execution | |
| Defense Impairment |
Telemetry Coverage
Rule Body
name: Windows AppX Deployment Full Trust Package Installation
id: 8560de46-ea2d-4c69-8ca3-5b78b90f1338
version: 4
creation_date: '2025-08-18'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
status: production
type: Hunting
description: The following analytic detects the installation of MSIX/AppX packages with full trust privileges. This detection leverages Windows event logs from the AppXDeployment-Server, specifically focusing on EventCode 400 which indicates a package deployment operation. Full trust packages are significant as they run with elevated privileges outside the normal AppX container restrictions, allowing them to access system resources that regular AppX packages cannot. Adversaries have been observed leveraging full trust MSIX packages to deliver malware, as documented in recent threat intelligence reports. If confirmed malicious, these packages could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges, establish persistence, or deliver malware while evading traditional detection mechanisms.
data_source:
- Windows Event Log AppXDeployment-Server 400
search: |-
`wineventlog_appxdeploymentserver` EventCode=400 HasFullTrust="true"
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime values(PackageFullName) as PackageFullName values(Path) as PackagePath values(PackageSourceUri) as PackageSourceUri values(PackageDisplayName) as PackageDisplayName values(CallingProcess) as CallingProcess values(IsCentennial) as IsCentennial
BY dvc EventCode HasFullTrust
user_id
| rename dvc as dest
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_appx_deployment_full_trust_package_installation_filter`
how_to_implement: To implement this search, you need to configure Windows event log collection for the Microsoft-Windows-AppXDeploymentServer/Operational channel. This can be done through Windows Event Forwarding, Splunk Universal Forwarders, or other log collection methods. Ensure that the log collection method preserves the full XML structure of the events. The sourcetype should be set to XmlWinEventLog or WinEventLog depending on your environment configuration. This detection specifically looks for EventCode 400, which indicates package deployment operations, and filters for packages with full trust privileges.
known_false_positives: Legitimate applications may be deployed as full trust MSIX packages, especially line-of-business applications that require access to system resources. Microsoft Store applications, development tools, and enterprise applications may legitimately use full trust packages. Verify if the package is from a trusted source and signed by a trusted publisher before taking action. Review the package source URI and calling process to determine if the installation is expected in your environment.
references:
- https://redcanary.com/blog/threat-intelligence/msix-installers/
- https://redcanary.com/threat-detection-report/techniques/installer-packages/
- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/msix/desktop/desktop-to-uwp-behind-the-scenes
- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/msix/package/package-identity
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1553/005/
analytic_story:
- MSIX Package Abuse
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1553.005
- T1204.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`wineventlog_appxdeploymentserver` EventCode=400 HasFullTrust="true"
Stage 2: stats
| stats
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
values(PackageFullName) as PackageFullName
values(Path) as PackagePath
values(PackageSourceUri) as PackageSourceUri
values(PackageDisplayName) as PackageDisplayName
values(CallingProcess) as CallingProcess
values(IsCentennial) as IsCentennial
BY dvc EventCode HasFullTrust
user_id
Stage 3: rename
| rename dvc as dest
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `windows_appx_deployment_full_trust_package_installation_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventCode | eq |
| field:"EventID" kind:eq value:"400" |
HasFullTrust | eq |
| field:"HasFullTrust" kind:eq value:"true" |
Windows Certutil Root Certificate Addition
#The following analytic detects the use of certutil.exe to add a certificate to the Root certificate store using the "-addstore" flag. In this case, the certificate is loaded from a temporary file path (e.g., %TEMP%) or other uncommon locations (e.g. C:\Users\Public\), which is highly suspicious and uncommon in legitimate administrative activity. This behavior may indicate an adversary is installing a malicious root certificate to intercept HTTPS traffic, impersonate trusted entities, or bypass security controls. The use of flags such as -f (force) and -Enterprise, combined with loading .tmp files from user-writable locations, is consistent with post-exploitation activity seen in credential theft and adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) attacks. This should be investigated immediately, especially if correlated with unauthorized privilege use or prior certificate modifications. You should monitor when new certificates are added to the root store because this store is what your system uses to decide which websites, apps, and software can be trusted. If an attacker manages to add their own certificate there, they can silently intercept encrypted traffic, impersonate trusted websites, or make malicious programs look safe. This means they could steal sensitive data, bypass security tools, and keep access to your system even after other malware is removed.
Known False Positives
- Administrators or third party utilities may use leverage certutil in order to add a root certificate to the store. Filter as needed or restrict to critical assets on the perimeter.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Resource Development |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Windows Certutil Root Certificate Addition
id: e9926391-ec0c-4bad-8a95-e450dbf6aae4
version: 6
creation_date: '2022-10-27'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Nasreddine Bencherchali, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: |
The following analytic detects the use of certutil.exe to add a certificate to the Root certificate store using the "-addstore" flag.
In this case, the certificate is loaded from a temporary file path (e.g., %TEMP%) or other uncommon locations (e.g. C:\\Users\\Public\\), which is highly suspicious and uncommon in legitimate administrative activity.
This behavior may indicate an adversary is installing a malicious root certificate to intercept HTTPS traffic, impersonate trusted entities, or bypass security controls.
The use of flags such as -f (force) and -Enterprise, combined with loading .tmp files from user-writable locations, is consistent with post-exploitation activity seen in credential theft and adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) attacks.
This should be investigated immediately, especially if correlated with unauthorized privilege use or prior certificate modifications.
You should monitor when new certificates are added to the root store because this store is what your system uses to decide which websites, apps, and software can be trusted.
If an attacker manages to add their own certificate there, they can silently intercept encrypted traffic, impersonate trusted websites, or make malicious programs look safe.
This means they could steal sensitive data, bypass security tools, and keep access to your system even after other malware is removed.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
search: |
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
values(Processes.process) as process
from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where
`process_certutil`
Processes.process=*-addstore*
Processes.process=*root*
Processes.process IN (
"*:\\PerfLogs\\*",
"*:\\Windows\\Temp\\*",
"*\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\*",
"*\\ProgramData\\*",
"*\\Users\\Public\\*",
"*%AppData%*",
"*%Public%*",
"*%Temp%*",
"*%tmp%*"
)
by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
|`security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_certutil_root_certificate_addition_filter`
how_to_implement: |
The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed.
To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions.
These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
the EDR product.
The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model.
Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: |
Administrators or third party utilities may use leverage certutil in order to add a root certificate to the store. Filter as needed or restrict to critical assets on the perimeter.
references:
- https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/31/frozen-in-transit-secret-blizzards-aitm-campaign-against-diplomats/
- https://www.deepinstinct.com/blog/iranian-threat-actor-continues-to-develop-mass-exploitation-tools
- https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/retefe-banking-trojan-targets-sweden-switzerland-and-japan/
finding:
title: A potentially suspicious certificate was added to the Root certificate store via Certutil on $dest$.
entity:
field: dest
type: system
score: 50
threat_objects:
- field: parent_process_name
type: parent_process_name
analytic_story:
- Secret Blizzard
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1587.003
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
values(Processes.process) as process
from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where
`process_certutil`
Processes.process=*-addstore*
Processes.process=*root*
Processes.process IN (
"*:\\PerfLogs\\*",
"*:\\Windows\\Temp\\*",
"*\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\*",
"*\\ProgramData\\*",
"*\\Users\\Public\\*",
"*%AppData%*",
"*%Public%*",
"*%Temp%*",
"*%tmp%*"
)
by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name("Processes")`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_certutil_root_certificate_addition_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.original_file_name | eq |
| field:"OriginalFileName" kind:eq value:"CertUtil.exe" |
Processes.process | eq |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:eq |
Processes.process | in |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:in |
Processes.process_name | eq |
| field:"process_basename" kind:eq value:"certutil.exe" |
Windows Cmdline Tool Execution From Non-Shell Process
#The following analytic identifies instances where ipconfig.exe, systeminfo.exe, or similar tools are executed by a non-standard shell parent process, excluding CMD, PowerShell, or Explorer. This detection leverages Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) telemetry to monitor process creation events. Such behavior is significant as it may indicate adversaries using injected processes to perform system discovery, a tactic observed in FIN7's JSSLoader. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to gather critical host information, aiding in further exploitation or lateral movement within the network.
Known False Positives
- A network operator or systems administrator may utilize an automated host discovery application that may generate false positives. Filter as needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Execution |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Windows Cmdline Tool Execution From Non-Shell Process
id: 2afa393f-b88d-41b7-9793-623c93a2dfde
version: 13
creation_date: '2021-09-14'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic identifies instances where `ipconfig.exe`, `systeminfo.exe`, or similar tools are executed by a non-standard shell parent process, excluding CMD, PowerShell, or Explorer. This detection leverages Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) telemetry to monitor process creation events. Such behavior is significant as it may indicate adversaries using injected processes to perform system discovery, a tactic observed in FIN7's JSSLoader. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to gather critical host information, aiding in further exploitation or lateral movement within the network.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where Processes.process_name IN ("ipconfig.exe", "systeminfo.exe", "net1.exe", "arp.exe", "nslookup.exe", "route.exe", "netstat.exe", "hostname.exe", "whoami.exe") AND NOT Processes.parent_process_name IN ("cmd.exe", "powershell.exe", "powershell_ise.exe", "pwsh.exe", "explorer.exe", "-", "unknown") by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product | `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_cmdline_tool_execution_from_non_shell_process_filter`'
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process. Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: A network operator or systems administrator may utilize an automated host discovery application that may generate false positives. Filter as needed.
references:
- https://www.mandiant.com/resources/fin7-pursuing-an-enigmatic-and-evasive-global-criminal-operation
- https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G0046/
- https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2023/05/24/volt-typhoon-targets-us-critical-infrastructure-with-living-off-the-land-techniques/
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: A non-standard parent process $parent_process_name$ spawned child process $process_name$ to execute command-line tool on $dest$.
- field: user
type: user
score: 20
message: A non-standard parent process $parent_process_name$ spawned child process $process_name$ to execute command-line tool on $dest$.
threat_objects:
- field: parent_process_name
type: parent_process_name
- field: process_name
type: process_name
analytic_story:
- CISA AA22-277A
- Gozi Malware
- CISA AA23-347A
- Qakbot
- Medusa Ransomware
- DarkGate Malware
- Rhysida Ransomware
- Volt Typhoon
- FIN7
- Water Gamayun
- Tuoni
- SolarWinds WHD RCE Post Exploitation
- BlankGrabber Stealer
- Gh0st RAT
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1059.007
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes
where Processes.process_name IN (
"ipconfig.exe",
"systeminfo.exe",
"net1.exe",
"arp.exe",
"nslookup.exe",
"route.exe",
"netstat.exe",
"hostname.exe",
"whoami.exe"
) AND NOT Processes.parent_process_name IN (
"cmd.exe",
"powershell.exe",
"powershell_ise.exe",
"pwsh.exe",
"explorer.exe",
"-",
"unknown"
)
by
Processes.action
Processes.dest
Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process
Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name
Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process
Processes.process_exec
Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash
Processes.process_id
Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name
Processes.process_path
Processes.user
Processes.user_id
Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_cmdline_tool_execution_from_non_shell_process_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.process_name | in |
| field:"process_basename" kind:in |
Exclusions
The rule actively suppresses these predicates.
| Field | Kind | Excluded values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.parent_process_name | in | -, cmd.exe, explorer.exe, powershell.exe, powershell_ise.exe, pwsh.exe, unknown | excludes:Processes.parent_process_name |
Windows Domain Account Discovery Via Get-NetComputer
#The following analytic detects the execution of the PowerView PowerShell cmdlet Get-NetComputer, which is used to query Active Directory for user account details such as "samaccountname," "accountexpires," "lastlogon," and more. It leverages Event ID 4104 from PowerShell Script Block Logging to identify this activity. This behavior is significant as it may indicate an attempt to gather user account information, which is often a precursor to further malicious actions. If confirmed malicious, this activity could lead to unauthorized access, privilege escalation, or lateral movement within the network.
Known False Positives
- Administrators may leverage PowerView for legitimate purposes, filter as needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Discovery |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| PowerShell | Event ID 4104: Creating Scriptblock text (MessageNumber of MessageTotal). |
Rule Body
name: Windows Domain Account Discovery Via Get-NetComputer
id: a7fbbc4e-4571-424a-b627-6968e1c939e4
version: 12
creation_date: '2024-01-10'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic detects the execution of the PowerView PowerShell cmdlet Get-NetComputer, which is used to query Active Directory for user account details such as "samaccountname," "accountexpires," "lastlogon," and more. It leverages Event ID 4104 from PowerShell Script Block Logging to identify this activity. This behavior is significant as it may indicate an attempt to gather user account information, which is often a precursor to further malicious actions. If confirmed malicious, this activity could lead to unauthorized access, privilege escalation, or lateral movement within the network.
data_source:
- Powershell Script Block Logging 4104
search: |-
`powershell` EventCode=4104 ScriptBlockText = "*Get-NetComputer*" ScriptBlockText IN ("*samaccountname*", "*accountexpires*", "*lastlogon*", "*lastlogoff*", "*pwdlastset*", "*logoncount*")
| fillnull
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY dest signature signature_id
user_id vendor_product EventID
Guid Opcode Name
Path ProcessID ScriptBlockId
ScriptBlockText
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_domain_account_discovery_via_get_netcomputer_filter`
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this analytic, you will need to enable PowerShell Script Block Logging on some or all endpoints. Additional setup here https://help.splunk.com/en/security-offerings/splunk-user-behavior-analytics/get-data-in/5.4.1/add-other-data-to-splunk-uba/configure-powershell-logging-to-see-powershell-anomalies-in-splunk-uba.=
known_false_positives: Administrators may leverage PowerView for legitimate purposes, filter as needed.
references:
- https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-347a
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: Windows Domain Account Discovery Via Get-NetComputer on $dest$.
analytic_story:
- CISA AA23-347A
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1087.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`powershell` EventCode=4104 ScriptBlockText = "*Get-NetComputer*" ScriptBlockText IN (
"*samaccountname*",
"*accountexpires*",
"*lastlogon*",
"*lastlogoff*",
"*pwdlastset*",
"*logoncount*"
)
Stage 2: fillnull
| fillnull
Stage 3: stats
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY dest signature signature_id
user_id vendor_product EventID
Guid Opcode Name
Path ProcessID ScriptBlockId
ScriptBlockText
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `windows_domain_account_discovery_via_get_netcomputer_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventCode | eq |
| field:"EventID" kind:eq value:"4104" |
ScriptBlockText | eq |
| field:"ScriptBlockText" kind:eq value:"*Get-NetComputer*" |
ScriptBlockText | in |
| field:"ScriptBlockText" kind:in |
Windows Input Capture Using Credential UI Dll
#The following analytic detects a process loading the credui.dll or wincredui.dll module. This detection leverages Sysmon EventCode 7 to identify instances where these DLLs are loaded by processes outside typical system directories. This activity is significant because adversaries often abuse these modules to create fake credential prompts or dump credentials, posing a risk of credential theft. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to harvest user credentials, leading to unauthorized access and potential lateral movement within the network.
Known False Positives
- this module can be loaded by a third party application. Filter is needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Credential Access | |
| Collection |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 7: Image loaded |
Rule Body
name: Windows Input Capture Using Credential UI Dll
id: 406c21d6-6c75-4e9f-9ca9-48049a1dd90e
version: 9
creation_date: '2022-08-31'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
status: production
type: Hunting
description: The following analytic detects a process loading the credui.dll or wincredui.dll module. This detection leverages Sysmon EventCode 7 to identify instances where these DLLs are loaded by processes outside typical system directories. This activity is significant because adversaries often abuse these modules to create fake credential prompts or dump credentials, posing a risk of credential theft. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to harvest user credentials, leading to unauthorized access and potential lateral movement within the network.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 7
search: '`sysmon` EventCode=7 (ImageLoaded = "*\\credui.dll" AND OriginalFileName = "credui.dll") OR (ImageLoaded = "*\\wincredui.dll" AND OriginalFileName = "wincredui.dll") AND NOT(Image IN("*\\windows\\explorer.exe", "*\\windows\\system32\\*", "*\\windows\\sysWow64\\*", "*:\\program files*")) | fillnull | stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime by Image ImageLoaded dest loaded_file loaded_file_path original_file_name process_exec process_guid process_hash process_id process_name process_path service_dll_signature_exists service_dll_signature_verified signature signature_id user_id vendor_product | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_input_capture_using_credential_ui_dll_filter`'
how_to_implement: The latest Sysmon TA 3.0 https://splunkbase.splunk.com/app/5709 will add the ImageLoaded name to the process_name field, allowing this query to work. Use as an example and implement for other products.
known_false_positives: this module can be loaded by a third party application. Filter is needed.
references:
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/wincred/nf-wincred-creduipromptforcredentialsa
- https://github.com/redcanaryco/atomic-red-team/blob/f339e7da7d05f6057fdfcdd3742bfcf365fee2a9/atomics/T1056.002/T1056.002.md#atomic-test-2---powershell---prompt-user-for-password
analytic_story:
- Brute Ratel C4
- APT37 Rustonotto and FadeStealer
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1056.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`sysmon` EventCode=7 (ImageLoaded = "*\\credui.dll" AND OriginalFileName = "credui.dll") OR (
ImageLoaded = "*\\wincredui.dll"
AND OriginalFileName = "wincredui.dll"
) AND NOT(
Image IN(
"*\\windows\\explorer.exe",
"*\\windows\\system32\\*",
"*\\windows\\sysWow64\\*",
"*:\\program files*"
)
)
Stage 2: fillnull
| fillnull
Stage 3: stats
| stats
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
by
Image
ImageLoaded
dest
loaded_file
loaded_file_path
original_file_name
process_exec
process_guid
process_hash
process_id
process_name
process_path
service_dll_signature_exists
service_dll_signature_verified
signature
signature_id
user_id
vendor_product
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 6: search
| `windows_input_capture_using_credential_ui_dll_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
EventCode | eq |
| field:"EventID" kind:eq value:"7" |
ImageLoaded | eq |
| field:"ImageLoaded" kind:eq |
OriginalFileName | eq |
| field:"OriginalFileName" kind:eq |
Windows Modify Registry Suppress Win Defender Notif
#The following analytic detects modifications in the Windows registry to suppress Windows Defender notifications. It leverages data from the Endpoint.Registry datamodel, specifically targeting changes to the "Notification_Suppress" registry value. This activity is significant because adversaries, including those deploying Azorult malware, use this technique to bypass Windows Defender and disable critical notifications. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could allow attackers to evade detection, maintain persistence, and execute further malicious activities without alerting the user or security tools.
Known False Positives
- administrators may enable or disable this feature that may cause some false positive.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Persistence | |
| Defense Impairment |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 13: RegistryEvent (Value Set) |
Rule Body
name: Windows Modify Registry Suppress Win Defender Notif
id: e3b42daf-fff4-429d-bec8-2a199468cea9
version: 11
creation_date: '2022-06-22'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic detects modifications in the Windows registry to suppress Windows Defender notifications. It leverages data from the Endpoint.Registry datamodel, specifically targeting changes to the "Notification_Suppress" registry value. This activity is significant because adversaries, including those deploying Azorult malware, use this technique to bypass Windows Defender and disable critical notifications. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could allow attackers to evade detection, maintain persistence, and execute further malicious activities without alerting the user or security tools.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 13
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry where Registry.registry_path= "*\\Windows Defender\\UX Configuration\\Notification_Suppress*" Registry.registry_value_data="0x00000001" by Registry.action Registry.dest Registry.process_guid Registry.process_id Registry.registry_hive Registry.registry_path Registry.registry_key_name Registry.registry_value_data Registry.registry_value_name Registry.registry_value_type Registry.status Registry.user Registry.vendor_product | `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_modify_registry_suppress_win_defender_notif_filter`'
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Registry` node. Also make sure that this registry was included in your config files ex. sysmon config to be monitored.
known_false_positives: administrators may enable or disable this feature that may cause some false positive.
references:
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/customize/desktop/unattend/microsoft-windows-remoteassistance-exe-fallowtogethelp
- https://app.any.run/tasks/a6f2ffe2-e6e2-4396-ae2e-04ea0143f2d8/
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: the registry for suppresing windows fdefender notification settings was modified to disabled on $dest$
analytic_story:
- Azorult
- CISA AA23-347A
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1112
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Registry
where Registry.registry_path= "*\\Windows Defender\\UX Configuration\\Notification_Suppress*"
Registry.registry_value_data="0x00000001"
by
Registry.action
Registry.dest
Registry.process_guid
Registry.process_id
Registry.registry_hive
Registry.registry_path
Registry.registry_key_name
Registry.registry_value_data
Registry.registry_value_name
Registry.registry_value_type
Registry.status
Registry.user
Registry.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Registry)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_modify_registry_suppress_win_defender_notif_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Registry.registry_path | eq |
| field:"registry_path" kind:eq value:"*\Windows Defender\UX Configuration\Notification_Suppress*" |
Registry.registry_value_data | eq |
| field:"Details" kind:eq value:"0x00000001" |
Windows RDP Bitmap Cache File Creation
#This detection identifies the creation of Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) bitmap cache files on a Windows system, typically located in the user’s profile under the Terminal Server Client cache directory. These files (.bmc, cache.bin) are generated when a user initiates an RDP session using the built-in mstsc.exe client. Their presence can indicate interactive remote access activity and may be useful in detecting lateral movement or unauthorized RDP usage. Monitoring this behavior is especially important, as attackers may attempt to delete or suppress these artifacts to evade forensic analysis.
Known False Positives
- False positives will be present, filter as needed or restrict to critical assets on the perimeter.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Lateral Movement |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 11: FileCreate |
Rule Body
name: Windows RDP Bitmap Cache File Creation
id: 5f8671b6-07a7-425d-b3da-c39a53f2a6ae
version: 4
creation_date: '2025-08-06'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: This detection identifies the creation of Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) bitmap cache files on a Windows system, typically located in the user’s profile under the Terminal Server Client cache directory. These files (*.bmc, cache*.bin) are generated when a user initiates an RDP session using the built-in mstsc.exe client. Their presence can indicate interactive remote access activity and may be useful in detecting lateral movement or unauthorized RDP usage. Monitoring this behavior is especially important, as attackers may attempt to delete or suppress these artifacts to evade forensic analysis.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 11
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Filesystem where Filesystem.file_path IN ("*\\Terminal Server Client\\Cache\\*.bmc", "*\\Terminal Server Client\\Cache\\cache*.bin") by Filesystem.action Filesystem.dest Filesystem.file_access_time Filesystem.file_create_time Filesystem.file_hash Filesystem.file_modify_time Filesystem.file_name Filesystem.file_path Filesystem.file_acl Filesystem.file_size Filesystem.process_guid Filesystem.process_id Filesystem.user Filesystem.vendor_product | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` |`drop_dm_object_name(Filesystem)` | `windows_rdp_bitmap_cache_file_creation_filter`'
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search, you must ingest logs that include the process name, TargetFilename, and ProcessID executions from your endpoints. If you are utilizing Sysmon, ensure you have at least version 2.0 of the Sysmon TA installed.
known_false_positives: False positives will be present, filter as needed or restrict to critical assets on the perimeter.
references:
- https://medium.com/@bonguides25/how-to-clear-rdp-connections-history-in-windows-cf0ffb67f344
- https://thelocalh0st.github.io/posts/rdp/
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: A rdp bitmap cache has been identified on $dest$.
analytic_story:
- Windows RDP Artifacts and Defense Evasion
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1021.001
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Filesystem
where Filesystem.file_path IN (
"*\\Terminal Server Client\\Cache\\*.bmc",
"*\\Terminal Server Client\\Cache\\cache*.bin"
)
by
Filesystem.action
Filesystem.dest
Filesystem.file_access_time
Filesystem.file_create_time
Filesystem.file_hash
Filesystem.file_modify_time
Filesystem.file_name
Filesystem.file_path
Filesystem.file_acl
Filesystem.file_size
Filesystem.process_guid
Filesystem.process_id
Filesystem.user
Filesystem.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Filesystem)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_rdp_bitmap_cache_file_creation_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Filesystem.file_path | in |
| field:"TargetFilename" kind:in |
Windows Snake Malware Kernel Driver Comadmin
#The following analytic detects the creation of the comadmin.dat file in the %windows%\system32\Com directory, which is associated with Snake Malware. This detection leverages the Endpoint.Filesystem data model to identify file creation events matching the specified path and filename. This activity is significant because the comadmin.dat file is part of Snake Malware's installation process, which includes dropping a kernel driver and a custom DLL. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow an attacker to load a malicious driver, potentially leading to privilege escalation and persistent access to the compromised system.
Known False Positives
- False positives may be present, filter as needed.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Persistence | |
| Privilege Escalation |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 11: FileCreate |
Rule Body
name: Windows Snake Malware Kernel Driver Comadmin
id: 628d9c7c-3242-43b5-9620-7234c080a726
version: 9
creation_date: '2023-05-11'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Michael Haag, Splunk
status: production
type: TTP
description: The following analytic detects the creation of the comadmin.dat file in the %windows%\system32\Com directory, which is associated with Snake Malware. This detection leverages the Endpoint.Filesystem data model to identify file creation events matching the specified path and filename. This activity is significant because the comadmin.dat file is part of Snake Malware's installation process, which includes dropping a kernel driver and a custom DLL. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow an attacker to load a malicious driver, potentially leading to privilege escalation and persistent access to the compromised system.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 11
search: '| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime from datamodel=Endpoint.Filesystem where Filesystem.file_path="*\\windows\\system32\\com\\*" AND Filesystem.file_name="comadmin.dat" by Filesystem.action Filesystem.dest Filesystem.file_access_time Filesystem.file_create_time Filesystem.file_hash Filesystem.file_modify_time Filesystem.file_name Filesystem.file_path Filesystem.file_acl Filesystem.file_size Filesystem.process_guid Filesystem.process_id Filesystem.user Filesystem.vendor_product | `drop_dm_object_name(Filesystem)` | `security_content_ctime(firstTime)` | `security_content_ctime(lastTime)` | `windows_snake_malware_kernel_driver_comadmin_filter`'
how_to_implement: To successfully implement this search you need to be ingesting information on process that include the name of the process responsible for the changes from your endpoints into the `Endpoint` datamodel in the `Filesystem` node. In addition, confirm the latest CIM App 4.20 or higher is installed and the latest TA for the endpoint product.
known_false_positives: False positives may be present, filter as needed.
references:
- https://media.defense.gov/2023/May/09/2003218554/-1/-1/0/JOINT_CSA_HUNTING_RU_INTEL_SNAKE_MALWARE_20230509.PDF
finding:
title: A kernel driver comadmin.dat related to Snake Malware was written to disk on $dest$.
entity:
field: dest
type: system
score: 50
analytic_story:
- Snake Malware
asset_type: Endpoint
atomic_guid:
- e5cb5564-cc7b-4050-86e8-f2d9eec1941f
mitre_attack_id:
- T1547.006
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count
min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
from datamodel=Endpoint.Filesystem
where Filesystem.file_path="*\\windows\\system32\\com\\*" AND Filesystem.file_name="comadmin.dat"
by
Filesystem.action
Filesystem.dest
Filesystem.file_access_time
Filesystem.file_create_time
Filesystem.file_hash
Filesystem.file_modify_time
Filesystem.file_name
Filesystem.file_path
Filesystem.file_acl
Filesystem.file_size
Filesystem.process_guid
Filesystem.process_id
Filesystem.user
Filesystem.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Filesystem)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_snake_malware_kernel_driver_comadmin_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Filesystem.file_name | eq |
| field:"file_name" kind:eq value:"comadmin.dat" |
Filesystem.file_path | eq |
| field:"TargetFilename" kind:eq value:"*\windows\system32\com\*" |
Windows System Network Connections Discovery Netsh
#The following analytic detects the execution of the Windows built-in tool netsh.exe to display the state, configuration, and profile of the host firewall. This detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on command-line executions and process metadata. Monitoring this activity is crucial as netsh.exe can be used by adversaries to bypass firewall rules or discover firewall settings. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to manipulate firewall configurations, potentially leading to unauthorized network access or data exfiltration.
Known False Positives
- Network administrators, power users, and third party tools can and will use this utility for various purposes. Apply the necessary filters by user, parent process, and command line.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Discovery |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Windows System Network Connections Discovery Netsh
id: abfb7cc5-c275-4a97-9029-62cd8d4ffeca
version: 12
creation_date: '2022-12-06'
modification_date: '2026-06-25'
author: Teoderick Contreras, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic detects the execution of the Windows built-in tool netsh.exe to display the state, configuration, and profile of the host firewall. This detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on command-line executions and process metadata. Monitoring this activity is crucial as netsh.exe can be used by adversaries to bypass firewall rules or discover firewall settings. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to manipulate firewall configurations, potentially leading to unauthorized network access or data exfiltration.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
search: |-
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
`process_netsh`
Processes.process="* show *"
Processes.process IN ("*state*", "*config*", "*wlan*", "*profile*")
BY Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_system_network_connections_discovery_netsh_filter`
how_to_implement: The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search, you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process. Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint` data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: |-
Network administrators, power users, and third party tools can and will use this utility for various purposes. Apply the necessary filters by user, parent process, and command line.
references:
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1049/
- https://github.com/carlospolop/PEASS-ng/tree/master/winPEAS
- https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2022/10/14/new-prestige-ransomware-impacts-organizations-in-ukraine-and-poland/
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: netsh process with command line $process$ on $dest$
analytic_story:
- Windows Post-Exploitation
- Prestige Ransomware
- Snake Keylogger
- BlankGrabber Stealer
- VIP Keylogger
- Phantom Stealer
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1049
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
`process_netsh`
Processes.process="* show *"
Processes.process IN ("*state*", "*config*", "*wlan*", "*profile*")
BY Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.parent_process_id Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_system_network_connections_discovery_netsh_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.original_file_name | eq |
| field:"OriginalFileName" kind:eq value:"netsh.exe" |
Processes.process | eq |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:eq value:"* show *" |
Processes.process | in |
| field:"CommandLine" kind:in |
Processes.process_name | eq |
| field:"process_basename" kind:eq value:"netsh.exe" |
Windows TOR Client Execution
#The following analytic detects the execution of the TOR Browser and related TOR components on Windows endpoints by monitoring process creation activity. Adversaries and insider threats leverage TOR to anonymize command-and-control traffic, facilitate data exfiltration, and evade network monitoring and policy enforcement. While TOR can be used for legitimate research and privacy purposes, its presence on enterprise endpoints is often unusual and should be investigated to determine intent, scope, and any associated malicious behavior.
Known False Positives
- This detection focuses on TOR-related processes and may generate benign matches in environments where TOR is intentionally used, such as security testing, research, or lab environments.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Command & Control |
Telemetry Coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
| Security-Auditing | Event ID 4688: A new process has been created. |
Rule Body
name: Windows TOR Client Execution
id: f164bc6f-ecbe-45e0-aaa6-f5c4d8c84b9a
version: 4
creation_date: '2026-02-02'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Vignesh Subramanian, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: |
The following analytic detects the execution of the TOR Browser and related TOR components on Windows endpoints by monitoring process creation activity.
Adversaries and insider threats leverage TOR to anonymize command-and-control traffic, facilitate data exfiltration, and evade network monitoring and policy enforcement.
While TOR can be used for legitimate research and privacy purposes, its presence on enterprise endpoints is often unusual and should be investigated to determine intent, scope, and any associated malicious behavior.
data_source:
- CrowdStrike ProcessRollup2
- Sysmon EventID 1
- Windows Event Log Security 4688
search: |
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where
(
Processes.process_name = "tor.exe"
OR
(
Processes.process_path = "*\\BraveSoftware\\Brave-Browser*"
Processes.process_path = "*\\tor-*"
)
)
by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_tor_client_execution_filter`
how_to_implement: |
The detection is based on data that originates from Endpoint Detection
and Response (EDR) agents. These agents are designed to provide security-related
telemetry from the endpoints where the agent is installed. To implement this search,
you must ingest logs that contain the process GUID, process name, and parent process.
Additionally, you must ingest complete command-line executions. These logs must
be processed using the appropriate Splunk Technology Add-ons that are specific to
the EDR product. The logs must also be mapped to the `Processes` node of the `Endpoint`
data model. Use the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) to normalize the field
names and speed up the data modeling process.
known_false_positives: |
This detection focuses on TOR-related processes and may generate benign matches in environments where TOR is intentionally used, such as security testing, research, or lab environments.
references:
- https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/tor-traffic-enterprise-networks/
- https://attack.mitre.org/software/S0183/
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1090/003/
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 20
message: TOR client process $process_name$ was launched by parent process $parent_process_name$ on host $dest$ by the user $user$ with command line $process$
- field: user
type: user
score: 20
message: TOR client process $process_name$ was launched by parent process $parent_process_name$ on host $dest$ by the user $user$ with command line $process$
threat_objects:
- field: parent_process_name
type: parent_process_name
- field: process
type: process
- field: process_name
type: process_name
analytic_story:
- Compromised Windows Host
- Windows Post-Exploitation
- Command And Control
- Data Exfiltration
- Data Protection
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1090.003
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly` count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
from datamodel=Endpoint.Processes where
(
Processes.process_name = "tor.exe"
OR
(
Processes.process_path = "*\\BraveSoftware\\Brave-Browser*"
Processes.process_path = "*\\tor-*"
)
)
by Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id Processes.process_integrity_level
Processes.process_name Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: search
| `windows_tor_client_execution_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.process_name | eq |
| field:"process_basename" kind:eq value:"tor.exe" |
Processes.process_path | eq |
| field:"Image" kind:eq |
Zscaler Legal Liability Threat Blocked
#The following analytic identifies significant legal liability threats blocked by the Zscaler web proxy. It uses web proxy logs to track destinations, device owners, users, URL categories, and actions associated with legal liability. By leveraging statistics on unique fields, it ensures a precise focus on these threats. This activity is significant for SOC as it helps enforce legal compliance and risk management. If confirmed malicious, it could indicate attempts to access legally sensitive or restricted content, potentially leading to legal repercussions and compliance violations.
Known False Positives
- False positives are limited to Zscaler configuration.
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Initial Access |
Rule Body
name: Zscaler Legal Liability Threat Blocked
id: bbf55ebf-c416-4f62-94d9-4064f2a28014
version: 9
creation_date: '2024-04-17'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Rod Soto, Gowthamaraj Rajendran, Splunk
status: production
type: Anomaly
description: The following analytic identifies significant legal liability threats blocked by the Zscaler web proxy. It uses web proxy logs to track destinations, device owners, users, URL categories, and actions associated with legal liability. By leveraging statistics on unique fields, it ensures a precise focus on these threats. This activity is significant for SOC as it helps enforce legal compliance and risk management. If confirmed malicious, it could indicate attempts to access legally sensitive or restricted content, potentially leading to legal repercussions and compliance violations.
data_source: []
search: |-
`zscaler_proxy` urlclass="Legal Liability"
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY action deviceowner user
urlcategory url src
dest
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| dedup urlcategory
| `zscaler_legal_liability_threat_blocked_filter`
how_to_implement: You must install the latest version of Zscaler Add-on from Splunkbase. You must be ingesting Zscaler events into your Splunk environment through an ingester. This analytic was written to be used with the "zscalernss-web" sourcetype leveraging the Zscaler proxy data. This enables the integration with Splunk Enterprise Security. Security teams are encouraged to adjust the detection parameters, ensuring the detection is tailored to their specific environment.
known_false_positives: False positives are limited to Zscaler configuration.
references:
- https://help.zscaler.com/zia/nss-feed-output-format-web-logs
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: src
type: system
score: 20
message: Potential Legal Liability Threat from dest -[$dest$] on $src$ for user-[$user$].
- field: user
type: user
score: 20
message: Potential Legal Liability Threat from dest -[$dest$] on $src$ for user-[$user$].
threat_objects:
- field: url
type: url
analytic_story:
- Zscaler Browser Proxy Threats
asset_type: Web Server
mitre_attack_id:
- T1566
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: web
security_domain: threat
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: search
`zscaler_proxy` urlclass="Legal Liability"
Stage 2: stats
| stats count min(_time) as firstTime max(_time) as lastTime
BY action deviceowner user
urlcategory url src
dest
Stage 3: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 4: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 5: dedup
| dedup urlcategory
Stage 6: search
| `zscaler_legal_liability_threat_blocked_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
sourcetype | eq |
| field:"sourcetype" kind:eq value:"zscalernss-web" |
urlclass | eq |
| field:"urlclass" kind:eq value:"Legal Liability" |