Detection rules › Splunk
Windows UAC Bypass Suspicious Escalation Behavior
The following analytic detects when a process spawns an executable known for User Account Control (UAC) bypass exploitation and subsequently monitors for any child processes with a higher integrity level than the original process. This detection leverages Sysmon EventID 1 data, focusing on process integrity levels and known UAC bypass executables. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attacker has successfully used a UAC bypass exploit to escalate privileges. If confirmed malicious, the attacker could gain elevated privileges, potentially leading to further system compromise and persistent access.
Known false positives
- Including Werfault.exe may cause some unintended false positives related to normal application faulting, but is used in a number of UAC bypass techniques.
MITRE ATT&CK coverage
| Tactic | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Privilege Escalation |
Telemetry coverage
| Provider | Record / event type |
|---|---|
| Sysmon | Event ID 1: Process creation |
Rule body
name: Windows UAC Bypass Suspicious Escalation Behavior
id: 00d050d3-a5b4-4565-a6a5-a31f69681dc3
version: 14
creation_date: '2024-01-10'
modification_date: '2026-05-13'
author: Steven Dick
status: production
type: TTP
description: |-
The following analytic detects when a process spawns an executable known for User Account Control (UAC) bypass exploitation and subsequently monitors for any child processes with a higher integrity level than the original process.
This detection leverages Sysmon EventID 1 data, focusing on process integrity levels and known UAC bypass executables.
This activity is significant as it may indicate an attacker has successfully used a UAC bypass exploit to escalate privileges.
If confirmed malicious, the attacker could gain elevated privileges, potentially leading to further system compromise and persistent access.
data_source:
- Sysmon EventID 1 AND Sysmon EventID 1
search: |-
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
Processes.process_integrity_level IN (
"low",
"medium"
)
BY Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id
Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name
Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| eval original_integrity_level = CASE(
match(process_integrity_level,"low"),1,
match(process_integrity_level,"medium"),2,
match(process_integrity_level,"high"),3,
match(process_integrity_level,"system"),4,
true(),0
)
| rename process_guid as join_guid_1,
process* as parent_process*
| join max=0 dest join_guid_1 [
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
Processes.process_integrity_level IN (
"high",
"system"
)
Processes.process_name IN (`uacbypass_process_name`)
BY Processes.dest Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.process_name Processes.process_guid
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| rename parent_process_guid as join_guid_1,
process_guid as join_guid_2,
process_name as uac_process_name
]
| join max=0 dest join_guid_2 [
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
Processes.parent_process_name IN (`uacbypass_process_name`)
Processes.process_integrity_level IN (
"high",
"system"
)
BY Processes.dest Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.process_name Processes.process
Processes.process_guid Processes.process_path
Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_current_directory
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| rename parent_process_guid as join_guid_2
| eval elevated_integrity_level = CASE(
match(process_integrity_level,"low"),1,
match(process_integrity_level,"medium"),2,
match(process_integrity_level,"high"),3,
match(process_integrity_level,"system"),4,
true(),0
)
]
| where elevated_integrity_level > original_integrity_level
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
| `windows_uac_bypass_suspicious_escalation_behavior_filter`
how_to_implement: |-
Target environment must ingest sysmon data, specifically Event ID 1 with process integrity level data.
known_false_positives: |-
Including Werfault.exe may cause some unintended false positives related to normal application faulting, but is used in a number of UAC bypass techniques.
references:
- https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1548/002/
- https://atomicredteam.io/defense-evasion/T1548.002/
- https://hadess.io/user-account-control-uncontrol-mastering-the-art-of-bypassing-windows-uac/
- https://enigma0x3.net/2016/08/15/fileless-uac-bypass-using-eventvwr-exe-and-registry-hijacking/
finding:
title: A UAC bypass behavior was detected by process $parent_process_name$ on host $dest$ by $user$.
entity:
field: user
type: user
score: 50
intermediate_findings:
entities:
- field: dest
type: system
score: 50
message: A UAC bypass behavior was detected by process $parent_process_name$ on host $dest$ by $user$.
threat_objects:
- field: parent_process_name
type: parent_process_name
- field: process_name
type: process_name
- field: process_name
type: process_name
analytic_story:
- Living Off The Land
- Compromised Windows Host
- Windows Defense Evasion Tactics
asset_type: Endpoint
mitre_attack_id:
- T1548.002
product:
- Splunk Enterprise
- Splunk Enterprise Security
- Splunk Cloud
category: endpoint
security_domain: endpoint
Stages and Predicates
Stage 1: tstats
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count max(_time) as lastTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
Processes.process_integrity_level IN (
"low",
"medium"
)
BY Processes.action Processes.dest Processes.original_file_name
Processes.parent_process Processes.parent_process_exec
Processes.parent_process_guid Processes.parent_process_id
Processes.parent_process_name Processes.parent_process_path
Processes.process Processes.process_exec Processes.process_guid
Processes.process_hash Processes.process_id
Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_name
Processes.process_path Processes.user
Processes.user_id Processes.vendor_product
Stage 2: search
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
Stage 3: eval
| eval original_integrity_level = CASE(
match(process_integrity_level,"low"),1,
match(process_integrity_level,"medium"),2,
match(process_integrity_level,"high"),3,
match(process_integrity_level,"system"),4,
true(),0
)
original_integrity_level =if
match(process_integrity_level, "low")1elif
match(process_integrity_level, "medium")2elif
match(process_integrity_level, "high")3elif
match(process_integrity_level, "system")4else
0Stage 4: rename
| rename process_guid as join_guid_1,
process* as parent_process*
Stage 5: join
| join max=0 dest join_guid_1 [
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
Processes.process_integrity_level IN (
"high",
"system"
)
Processes.process_name IN (`uacbypass_process_name`)
BY Processes.dest Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.process_name Processes.process_guid
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| rename parent_process_guid as join_guid_1,
process_guid as join_guid_2,
process_name as uac_process_name
]
Stage 6: join
| join max=0 dest join_guid_2 [
| tstats `security_content_summariesonly`
count min(_time) as firstTime
FROM datamodel=Endpoint.Processes WHERE
Processes.parent_process_name IN (`uacbypass_process_name`)
Processes.process_integrity_level IN (
"high",
"system"
)
BY Processes.dest Processes.parent_process_guid
Processes.process_name Processes.process
Processes.process_guid Processes.process_path
Processes.process_integrity_level Processes.process_current_directory
| `drop_dm_object_name(Processes)`
| rename parent_process_guid as join_guid_2
| eval elevated_integrity_level = CASE(
match(process_integrity_level,"low"),1,
match(process_integrity_level,"medium"),2,
match(process_integrity_level,"high"),3,
match(process_integrity_level,"system"),4,
true(),0
)
]
Stage 7: where
| where elevated_integrity_level > original_integrity_level
Stage 8: search
| `security_content_ctime(firstTime)`
Stage 9: search
| `security_content_ctime(lastTime)`
Stage 10: search
| `windows_uac_bypass_suspicious_escalation_behavior_filter`
Indicators
These rows show field, operator, and value matches.
| Field | Kind | Values | Search |
|---|---|---|---|
Processes.parent_process_name | in |
| field:"parent_process_name" kind:in |
Processes.process_integrity_level | in |
| field:"IntegrityLevel" kind:in |
Processes.process_name | in |
| field:"process_name" kind:in |
elevated_integrity_level | cross_field_compare |
| field:"elevated_integrity_level" kind:cross_field_compare value:"original_integrity_level" |